From 190011168dda6ce4836b105b892f0a26eaf07411 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksey Kladov Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 15:20:31 +0200 Subject: Introduce S-actionable and S-unactionable labels I've noticed that a significant fraction of issues are inert. They are valid, acknowledged and useful, but effectively can't be fixed for variety of reasons (no reproduction, dependencies on some other issues, no review capacity, etc). Marking issues that can be fixed by just applying some elbow grease seems useful! --- docs/dev/README.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/dev/README.md b/docs/dev/README.md index 36edddc70..90e74f226 100644 --- a/docs/dev/README.md +++ b/docs/dev/README.md @@ -35,7 +35,12 @@ https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0 * [E-easy](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-easy), [E-medium](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-medium), [E-hard](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-hard), - labels are *estimates* for how hard would be to write a fix. + [E-unknown](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-unknown), + labels are *estimates* for how hard would be to write a fix. Each triaged issue should have one of these labels. +* [S-actionable](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AS-actionable) and + [S-unactionable](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AS-unactionable) + specify if there are concrete steps to resolve or advance an issue. Roughly, actionable issues need only work to be fixed, + while unactionable ones are effectively wont-fix. Each triaged issue should have one of these labels. * [fun](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Afun) is for cool, but probably hard stuff. -- cgit v1.2.3