From d171838d63907d004ab935d6564bfeb4238d5540 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:29:40 +0100
Subject: More accurately place proc-macro diagnostic

---
 crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs')

diff --git a/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs b/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs
index dd06e3f20..c71266dc0 100644
--- a/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs
+++ b/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ use stdx::format_to;
 use cfg::{CfgExpr, CfgOptions, DnfExpr};
 use hir_expand::diagnostics::{Diagnostic, DiagnosticCode, DiagnosticSink};
 use hir_expand::{HirFileId, InFile};
-use syntax::{ast, AstPtr, SyntaxNodePtr};
+use syntax::{ast, AstPtr, SyntaxNodePtr, TextRange};
 
 use crate::{db::DefDatabase, DefWithBodyId};
 
@@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ impl Diagnostic for InactiveCode {
 pub struct UnresolvedProcMacro {
     pub file: HirFileId,
     pub node: SyntaxNodePtr,
+    /// If the diagnostic can be pinpointed more accurately than via `node`, this is the `TextRange`
+    /// to use instead.
+    pub precise_location: Option<TextRange>,
     pub macro_name: Option<String>,
 }
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3