From 0a8c30a96fe09047da07a8e2980baa47a334a3d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dawer <7803845+iDawer@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 01:29:07 +0500
Subject: internal: implement pattern adjustments.

---
 crates/hir_ty/src/diagnostics/match_check.rs | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'crates/hir_ty/src/diagnostics/match_check.rs')

diff --git a/crates/hir_ty/src/diagnostics/match_check.rs b/crates/hir_ty/src/diagnostics/match_check.rs
index a9a99f57a..c8e1b23de 100644
--- a/crates/hir_ty/src/diagnostics/match_check.rs
+++ b/crates/hir_ty/src/diagnostics/match_check.rs
@@ -100,10 +100,19 @@ impl<'a> PatCtxt<'a> {
     }
 
     pub(crate) fn lower_pattern(&mut self, pat: hir_def::expr::PatId) -> Pat {
-        // FIXME: implement pattern adjustments (implicit pattern dereference; "RFC 2005-match-ergonomics")
+        // XXX(iDawer): Collecting pattern adjustments feels imprecise to me.
+        // When lowering of & and box patterns are implemented this should be tested
+        // in a manner of `match_ergonomics_issue_9095` test.
+        // Pattern adjustment is part of RFC 2005-match-ergonomics.
         // More info https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42640#issuecomment-313535089
         let unadjusted_pat = self.lower_pattern_unadjusted(pat);
-        unadjusted_pat
+        self.infer.pat_adjustments.get(&pat).map(|it| &**it).unwrap_or_default().iter().rev().fold(
+            unadjusted_pat,
+            |subpattern, ref_ty| Pat {
+                ty: ref_ty.clone(),
+                kind: Box::new(PatKind::Deref { subpattern }),
+            },
+        )
     }
 
     fn lower_pattern_unadjusted(&mut self, pat: hir_def::expr::PatId) -> Pat {
@@ -1236,6 +1245,21 @@ fn main(f: Foo) {
         );
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn match_ergonomics_issue_9095() {
+        check_diagnostics(
+            r#"
+enum Foo<T> { A(T) }
+fn main() {
+    match &Foo::A(true) {
+        _ => {}
+        Foo::A(_) => {}
+    }
+}
+"#,
+        );
+    }
+
     mod false_negatives {
         //! The implementation of match checking here is a work in progress. As we roll this out, we
         //! prefer false negatives to false positives (ideally there would be no false positives). This
-- 
cgit v1.2.3