From e1c0bdaf75f8d88a5c28b3e44def17d91d4f46b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:55:09 +0300
Subject: Introduce dedicated AST node for union

Although structs and unions have the same syntax and differ only in
the keyword, re-using the single syntax node for both of them leads to
confusion in practice, and propagates further down the hir in an
upleasent way.

Moreover, static and consts also share syntax, but we use different
nodes for them.
---
 crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

(limited to 'crates/ra_syntax/src/ast')

diff --git a/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs b/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs
index de506d7cd..1a03ae56c 100644
--- a/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs
+++ b/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs
@@ -3789,6 +3789,34 @@ impl AstNode for TypeRef {
 }
 impl TypeRef {}
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
+pub struct UnionDef {
+    pub(crate) syntax: SyntaxNode,
+}
+impl AstNode for UnionDef {
+    fn can_cast(kind: SyntaxKind) -> bool {
+        match kind {
+            UNION_DEF => true,
+            _ => false,
+        }
+    }
+    fn cast(syntax: SyntaxNode) -> Option<Self> {
+        if Self::can_cast(syntax.kind()) {
+            Some(Self { syntax })
+        } else {
+            None
+        }
+    }
+    fn syntax(&self) -> &SyntaxNode {
+        &self.syntax
+    }
+}
+impl ast::VisibilityOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::NameOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::TypeParamsOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::AttrsOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::DocCommentsOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl UnionDef {}
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
 pub struct UseItem {
     pub(crate) syntax: SyntaxNode,
 }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3