From 5258c817f78ecdfe12d7eec44ab3169134cba71d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 11:54:57 +0200
Subject: Remove cross-crate marks

They create quite a bit of friction. Really, we should just move the
tests to the same crate, rather than paper over existing split.
---
 crates/test_utils/src/marks.rs | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

(limited to 'crates/test_utils/src')

diff --git a/crates/test_utils/src/marks.rs b/crates/test_utils/src/marks.rs
index c3185e860..f20fb978e 100644
--- a/crates/test_utils/src/marks.rs
+++ b/crates/test_utils/src/marks.rs
@@ -30,12 +30,6 @@ use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
 
 #[macro_export]
 macro_rules! tested_by {
-    ($ident:ident; force) => {{
-        {
-            // sic! use call-site crate
-            crate::marks::$ident.fetch_add(1, std::sync::atomic::Ordering::SeqCst);
-        }
-    }};
     ($ident:ident) => {{
         #[cfg(test)]
         {
@@ -49,10 +43,7 @@ macro_rules! tested_by {
 macro_rules! covers {
     // sic! use call-site crate
     ($ident:ident) => {
-        $crate::covers!(crate::$ident)
-    };
-    ($krate:ident :: $ident:ident) => {
-        let _checker = $crate::marks::MarkChecker::new(&$krate::marks::$ident);
+        let _checker = $crate::marks::MarkChecker::new(&crate::marks::$ident);
     };
 }
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3