From dfb731430b89dc88b28695baaacafe1494e74411 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NerdyPepper Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 21:09:45 +0530 Subject: fix typo --- docs/index.html | 2 +- posts/onivim_sucks.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html index e1cf5ca..154408f 100644 --- a/docs/index.html +++ b/docs/index.html @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ which prohibits redistribution in both object code and source code formats.

Onivim’s source code is availabe on GitHub, but its licences make it fall under the ‘source availabe’ catagory and not -‘open source’. They do mention that the source code trickes down to the +‘open source’. They do mention that the source code trickles down to the oni2-mit repo, which contains (not yet) MIT-licenced code, 18 months after each commit to the original repo.

diff --git a/posts/onivim_sucks.md b/posts/onivim_sucks.md index 5756cbf..4641ee3 100644 --- a/posts/onivim_sucks.md +++ b/posts/onivim_sucks.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ which prohibits redistribution in both object code and source code formats. Onivim's source code is availabe on [GitHub](https://github.com/onivim/oni2), but its licences make it fall under the 'source availabe' catagory and not -'open source'. They do mention that the source code trickes down to the +'open source'. They do mention that the source code trickles down to the [oni2-mit](https://github.com/onivim/oni2-mit) repo, which contains (not yet) MIT-licenced code, **18 months** after each commit to the original repo. -- cgit v1.2.3