3 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/crates/hir_def/Cargo.toml b/crates/hir_def/Cargo.toml
index e8b581e2f..7ef966cd2 100644
--- a/crates/hir_def/Cargo.toml
+++ b/crates/hir_def/Cargo.toml
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ cfg = { path = "../cfg", version = "0.0.0" }
 tt = { path = "../tt", version = "0.0.0" }
 
 [dev-dependencies]
-expect-test = "1.0"
+expect-test = "1.1"
diff --git a/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs b/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs
index c71266dc0..ab3f059ce 100644
--- a/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs
+++ b/crates/hir_def/src/diagnostics.rs
@@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ impl Diagnostic for InactiveCode {
 // This diagnostic is shown when a procedural macro can not be found. This usually means that
 // procedural macro support is simply disabled (and hence is only a weak hint instead of an error),
 // but can also indicate project setup problems.
+//
+// If you are seeing a lot of "proc macro not expanded" warnings, you can add this option to the
+// `rust-analyzer.diagnostics.disabled` list to prevent them from showing. Alternatively you can
+// enable support for procedural macros (see `rust-analyzer.procMacro.enable`).
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Eq, PartialEq)]
 pub struct UnresolvedProcMacro {
     pub file: HirFileId,
diff --git a/crates/hir_def/src/path/lower.rs b/crates/hir_def/src/path/lower.rs
index 9518ac109..8a01e6eea 100644
--- a/crates/hir_def/src/path/lower.rs
+++ b/crates/hir_def/src/path/lower.rs
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ pub(super) fn lower_path(mut path: ast::Path, hygiene: &Hygiene) -> Option<Path>
     // We follow what it did anyway :)
     if segments.len() == 1 && kind == PathKind::Plain {
         if let Some(_macro_call) = path.syntax().parent().and_then(ast::MacroCall::cast) {
-            if let Some(crate_id) = hygiene.local_inner_macros(path) {
+            if let Some(crate_id) = hygiene.local_inner_macros() {
                 kind = PathKind::DollarCrate(crate_id);
             }
         }