2 files changed, 148 insertions, 37 deletions

diff --git a/docs/dev/README.md b/docs/dev/README.md
index 65cc9fc12..1de5a2aab 100644
--- a/docs/dev/README.md
+++ b/docs/dev/README.md
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0
 
 * [good-first-issue](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/labels/good%20first%20issue)
   are good issues to get into the project.
-* [E-mentor](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-mentor)
+* [E-has-instructions](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-has-instructions)
   issues have links to the code in question and tests.
 * [E-easy](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-easy),
   [E-medium](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-medium),
@@ -117,6 +117,109 @@ Additionally, I use `cargo run --release -p rust-analyzer -- analysis-stats
 path/to/some/rust/crate` to run a batch analysis. This is primarily useful for
 performance optimizations, or for bug minimization.
 
+# Code Style & Review Process
+
+Our approach to "clean code" is two fold:
+
+* We generally don't block PRs on style changes.
+* At the same time, all code in rust-analyzer is constantly refactored.
+
+It is explicitly OK for reviewer to flag only some nits in the PR, and than send a follow up cleanup PR for things which are easier to explain by example, cc-ing the original author.
+Sending small cleanup PRs (like rename a single local variable) is encouraged.
+
+## Scale of Changes
+
+Everyone knows that it's better to send small & focused pull requests.
+The problem is, sometimes you *have* to, eg, rewrite the whole compiler, and that just doesn't fit into a set of isolated PRs.
+
+The main thing too keep an eye on is the boundaries between various components.
+There are three kinds of changes:
+
+1. Internals of a single component are changed.
+   Specifically, you don't change any `pub` items.
+   A good example here would be an addition of a new assist.
+
+2. API of a component is expanded.
+   Specifically, you add a new `pub` function which wasn't there before.
+   A good example here would be expansion of assist API, for example, to implement lazy assists or assists groups.
+
+3. A new dependency between components is introduced.
+   Specifically, you add a `pub use` reexport from another crate or you add a new line to `[dependencies]` section of `Cargo.toml`.
+   A good example here would be adding reference search capability to the assists crates.
+
+For the first group, the change is generally merged as long as:
+
+* it works for the happy case,
+* it has tests,
+* it doesn't panic for unhappy case.
+
+For the second group, the change would be subjected to quite a bit of scrutiny and iteration.
+The new API needs to be right (or at least easy to change later).
+The actual implementation doesn't matter that much.
+It's very important to minimize the amount of changed lines of code for changes of the second kind.
+Often, you start doing change of the first kind, only to realise that you need to elevate to a change of the second kind.
+In this case, we'll probably ask you to split API changes into a separate PR.
+
+Changes of the third group should be pretty rare, so we don't specify any specific process for them.
+That said, adding an innocent-looking `pub use` is a very simple way to break encapsulation, keep an eye on it!
+
+Note: if you enjoyed this abstract hand-waving about boundaries, you might appreciate
+https://www.tedinski.com/2018/02/06/system-boundaries.html
+
+## Order of Imports
+
+We separate import groups with blank lines
+
+```
+mod x;
+mod y;
+
+use std::{ ... }
+
+use crate_foo::{ ... }
+use crate_bar::{ ... }
+
+use crate::{}
+
+use super::{} // but prefer `use crate::`
+```
+
+## Order of Items
+
+Optimize for the reader who sees the file for the first time, and wants to get the general idea about what's going on.
+People read things from top to bottom, so place most important things first.
+
+Specifically, if all items except one are private, always put the non-private item on top.
+
+Put `struct`s and `enum`s first, functions and impls last.
+
+Do
+
+```
+// Good
+struct Foo {
+  bars: Vec<Bar>
+}
+
+struct Bar;
+```
+
+rather than
+
+```
+// Not as good
+struct Bar;
+
+struct Foo {
+  bars: Vec<Bar>
+}
+```
+
+## Documentation
+
+For `.md` and `.adoc` files, prefer a sentence-per-line format, don't wrap lines.
+If the line is too long, you want to split the sentence in two :-)
+
 # Logging
 
 Logging is done by both rust-analyzer and VS Code, so it might be tricky to
diff --git a/docs/dev/lsp-extensions.md b/docs/dev/lsp-extensions.md
index c57a93f12..647cf6107 100644
--- a/docs/dev/lsp-extensions.md
+++ b/docs/dev/lsp-extensions.md
@@ -311,6 +311,50 @@ Moreover, it would be cool if editors didn't need to implement even basic langua
   This is how `SelectionRange` request works.
 * Alternatively, should we perhaps flag certain `SelectionRange`s as being brace pairs?
 
+## Runnables
+
+**Issue:** https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/944
+
+**Server Capability:** `{ "runnables": { "kinds": string[] } }`
+
+This request is send from client to server to get the list of things that can be run (tests, binaries, `cargo check -p`).
+
+**Method:** `experimental/runnables`
+
+**Request:**
+
+```typescript
+interface RunnablesParams {
+    textDocument: TextDocumentIdentifier;
+    /// If null, compute runnables for the whole file.
+    position?: Position;
+}
+```
+
+**Response:** `Runnable[]`
+
+```typescript
+interface Runnable {
+    label: string;
+    /// If this Runnable is associated with a specific function/module, etc, the location of this item
+    location?: LocationLink;
+    /// Running things is necessary technology specific, `kind` needs to be advertised via server capabilities,
+    // the type of `args` is specific to `kind`. The actual running is handled by the client.
+    kind: string;
+    args: any;
+}
+```
+
+rust-analyzer supports only one `kind`, `"cargo"`. The `args` for `"cargo"` look like this:
+
+```typescript
+{
+    workspaceRoot?: string;
+    cargoArgs: string[];
+    executableArgs: string[];
+}
+```
+
 ## Analyzer Status
 
 **Method:** `rust-analyzer/analyzerStatus`
@@ -399,39 +443,3 @@ interface InlayHint {
     label: string,
 }
 ```
-
-## Runnables
-
-**Method:** `rust-analyzer/runnables`
-
-This request is send from client to server to get the list of things that can be run (tests, binaries, `cargo check -p`).
-Note that we plan to move this request to `experimental/runnables`, as it is not really Rust-specific, but the current API is not necessary the right one.
-Upstream issue: https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/944
-
-**Request:**
-
-```typescript
-interface RunnablesParams {
-    textDocument: TextDocumentIdentifier;
-    /// If null, compute runnables for the whole file.
-    position?: Position;
-}
-```
-
-**Response:** `Runnable[]`
-
-```typescript
-interface Runnable {
-    /// The range this runnable is applicable for.
-    range: lc.Range;
-    /// The label to show in the UI.
-    label: string;
-    /// The following fields describe a process to spawn.
-    bin: string;
-    args: string[];
-    /// Args for cargo after `--`.
-    extraArgs: string[];
-    env: { [key: string]: string };
-    cwd: string | null;
-}
-```