| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2412: Fix stale crates that snuck in r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2406: Add hygiene information to SourceAnalyzer r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This should fix https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/2392#issuecomment-557964686
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2410: Introduce hir_ty r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2411: Update parking_lot and smallvec to drop some dependencies r=matklad a=kjeremy
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <[email protected]>
|
|/ / / |
|
|\| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2409: Id-ify Ty::Adt r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|\| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2398: WIP: introduce hir::Type r=matklad a=matklad
This introduces `hir::Type` wrapper over `hir::Ty`, with two purposes:
* bind `Ty` and it's corresponding environment
* Am I correct that `Ty` without an env doesn't make much sense, because the meaning of type parameters is unclear
* Am I correct that we can safely re-use the same environment for all types derived from the given type?
* hide representation defails of `Ty`. Specifically, I want to change `Ty::Adt` to use `hir_def::AdtId` instead of `hir::Adt`, but IDE doesn't know about underlying IDs. More generally, I feel like IDE shouldn't know that `Ty` is enum.
@flodiebold what do you think about this?
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| | |
It should provide a convenient API over more low-level Ty
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2408: Use chalk fork to paper over #2052 r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2407: :arrow_up: salsa r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2404: Use TypeAliasId in Ty, pt 2 r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2403: Fixme for union fields r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although structs and unions have the same syntax and differ only in
the keyword, re-using the single syntax node for both of them leads to
confusion in practice, and propagates further down the hir in an
upleasent way.
Moreover, static and consts also share syntax, but we use different
nodes for them.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2388: Show missing struct fields in the error message r=matklad a=Frizi
This provides the most interesting information about the "missing structure fields" error directly to the user.
Co-authored-by: Frizi <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2402: Use ids for Callable r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2401: Update crates r=matklad a=kjeremy
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2400: Use GenericDefIdMore r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
|\| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2399: Use GenericDefId more r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
|/ / / |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2397: Remove Resolver from autoderef r=matklad a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Resolver holds onto too much context, including local scopes. Let's
try to pass in only what is necessary -- the trait environment.
|
|/ / / |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2362: Expand compile_error! r=edwin0cheng a=kjeremy
Does not validate that the input is a string literal. I thought that I could `match_ast!` against the `macro_args` but that did not work. Even if it had I am not sure which error would be appropriate.
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2392: Fix panic during the expansion of `column!` r=edwin0cheng a=marcogroppo
Fixes #2379. Well, this isn't the "proper" fix but it doesn't hurt, IMHO.
The problem is that `to_col_number`, called by `column_expand`, receives a position number that isn't included in the text range of the file. My (very limited) understanding is that the text is the one of the original file, while `pos` is relative to something else, probably the text of the macro. Notice that in this case the `column!` expansion seems to be triggered by `assert_eq!`, so we're in the middle of another expansion. This PR simply avoids the panic by checking the length of the text.
r? @edwin0cheng
Co-authored-by: Marco Groppo <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
2396: Switch to variant-granularity field type inference r=flodiebold a=matklad
r? @flodiebold
Previously, we had a `ty` query for each field. This PR switcthes to a query per struct, which returns an `ArenaMap` with `Ty`s.
I don't know which approach is better. What is bugging me about the original approach is that, if we do all queries on the "leaf" defs, in practice we get a ton of queries which repeatedly reach into the parent definition to compute module, resolver, etc. This *seems* wasteful (but I don't think this is really what causes any perf problems for us).
At the same time, I've been looking at Kotlin, and they seem to use the general pattern of analyzing the *parent* definition, and storing info about children into a `BindingContext`.
I don't really which way is preferable. I think I want to try this approach, where query granularity generally mirrors the data granularity. The primary motivation for me here is probably just hope that we can avoid adding a ton of helpers to a `StructField`, and maybe in general avoid the need to switch to a global `StructField`, using `LocalStructFieldId` most of the time internally.
For external API (ie, for `ra_ide_api`), I think we should continue with fine-grained `StructField::ty` approach, which internally fetches the table for the whole struct and indexes into it.
In terms of actual memory savings, the results are as follows:
```
This PR:
142kb FieldTypesQuery (deps)
38kb FieldTypesQuery
Status Quo:
208kb TypeForFieldQuery (deps)
18kb TypeForFieldQuery
```
Note how the table itself occupies more than twice as much space! I don't have an explanation for this: a plausible hypothesis is that single-field structs are very common and for them the table is a pessimisation.
THere's noticiable wallclock time difference.
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|