aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* introduce docs dirAleksey Kladov2019-03-208-72/+74
|
* Merge #998bors[bot]2019-03-191-1/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 998: import resolution is immutable r=matklad a=matklad Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * import resolution is immutableAleksey Kladov2019-03-191-1/+1
| |
* | Merge #996bors[bot]2019-03-1910-42/+305
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 996: Allow attributes on top level expressions r=matklad a=pcpthm This PR modifies parser to allow outer attributes on top level expression. Here, top level expression means either - Expression statement e.g. `foo();` - Last expression in a block without semicolon `bar()` in `{ foo(); bar() }`. Except for binary operation expressions and `if` expressions, which are errors (feature gated) in rustc. Attributes on inner expressions like `foo(#[a] 1)` are not implemented. I first tried to implement this by passing `Maker` to expression parsers. However, this implementation couldn't parse `#[attr] foo()` correctly as `CallExpr(Attr(..), PathExpr(..), ArgList(..))` and instead parsed incorrectly as `CallExpr(PathExpr(Attr(..), ..), ArgList(..))` due to the way left recursion is handled. In the end, I introduce `undo_completion` method. Which is not the suggested approach, but it seems not very bad. Fix #759. Co-authored-by: pcpthm <[email protected]>
| * Replace `contract_child` to a less ad-hoc APIpcpthm2019-03-192-40/+37
| |
| * Mark non-code block as textpcpthm2019-03-191-1/+1
| |
| * Error about attributes onpcpthm2019-03-193-12/+82
| | | | | | | | unallowed types of expression statement
| * Allow attributes on top level expressionpcpthm2019-03-198-35/+231
| | | | | | | | | | | | A top level expression is either - a expression statement or - the last expression in a block
* | Merge #995bors[bot]2019-03-184-2/+106
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 995: Install and run `cargo watch` if user agrees r=matklad a=Xanewok This isn't a glorious patch but hopefully is useful :+1: This introduces a default background `cargo watch` task and (separately from that) asks the user on every startup if they want to run `cargo watch` (installs it if it's not available). r? @matklad does it fit the what you've been thinking about? Co-authored-by: Igor Matuszewski <[email protected]>
| * | Appease CIIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-9/+7
| | |
| * | Guard auto cargo watch behind a config optionIgor Matuszewski2019-03-183-0/+17
| | |
| * | Separate out the interactive cargo watch procedureIgor Matuszewski2019-03-182-64/+70
| | |
| * | Reformat using PrettierIgor Matuszewski2019-03-182-17/+35
| | |
| * | Remove unused importsIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-2/+1
| | |
| * | Prefer installing `cargo-watch` via Task APIIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-23/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | This gives us much more fine-grained stdout buffering and ANSI terminal colors.
| * | Respect the user-provided label when creating taskIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-1/+1
| | |
| * | Ask the user to install and start cargo watchIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-5/+61
| | |
| * | Define a cargo watch taskIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-1/+21
| | |
| * | Remove redundant Runnable.rangeIgor Matuszewski2019-03-181-1/+0
| |/
* | Merge #993bors[bot]2019-03-181-1/+40
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 993: Fix installing vscode extension on MacOS r=matklad a=funkill VSCode often installed in MacOS as `Visual Studio Code.app` package and `code` binary located at `Contents/Resources/app/bin` in package. This path not exists in `$PATH` variable and we can't run `code`. In previous version of `do_run` function all before space was command and all after - arguments. If path or command has spaces, extracting command breaks. To fix this i extracted command to separated argument of function. All packages can be placed in system app dir (`/Applications`) or user app dir (`~/Applications`). I created helper function for find app in this directories. Co-authored-by: funkill2 <[email protected]>
| * | set code less genericfunkill22019-03-181-50/+24
| | |
| * | added setup environmentfunkill22019-03-181-1/+12
| | |
| * | added helper module for appending vscode pathfunkill22019-03-181-0/+54
| |/
* | Merge #994bors[bot]2019-03-185-10/+61
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 994: Upgrade ra_vfs to use new Filtering r=matklad a=vipentti Upgrade `ra_vfs` to `0.2.0` that includes the filtering. Currently this matches the previous filtering, meaning all roots are filtered using the same rules. Co-authored-by: Ville Penttinen <[email protected]>
| * Upgrade ra_vfs to use new FilteringVille Penttinen2019-03-185-10/+61
|/ | | | | Currently this matches the previous filtering, meaning all roots are filtered using the same rules.
* Merge #991bors[bot]2019-03-1814-81/+149
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 991: Use Marker argument for item parsers r=matklad a=pcpthm Before doing this for expressions, I found that the pattern (Marker argument) should be applied to the item parsers because visiblity and modifiers are parsed in a separate function. Fixed some parser bugs: - Fix pub_expr: `pub 42;` was allowed. - Fix incorrect parsing of crate::path: incorrectly parsed as `crate` as a visibility. Co-authored-by: pcpthm <[email protected]>
| * Use Marker argument for item parserspcpthm2019-03-1814-81/+149
| | | | | | | | | | - Fix pub_expr - Fix incorrect parsing of crate::path
* | Merge #989bors[bot]2019-03-182-0/+153
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 989: Implement naive version of fill_struct_fields assist r=matklad a=yanchith Fixes #964 This implements the `fill_struct_fields` assist. Currently only works for named struct fields, but not for tuple structs, because we seem to be missing a `TupleStructLit` (akin to `StructLit`, but for tuple structs). I am happy to implement `TupleStructLit` parsing given some guidance (provided it's really missing) and make the assist work for tuple structs as well. Could do so either in this PR, or another one 🙂 Sorry if I missed something important, this is my first PR for Rust Analyzer. Btw is there any way to run the assists in emacs? UPDATE: I just realized that parsing `TupleStructLit` would be quite difficult as it it really similar, if not identical to a function call... Co-authored-by: yanchith <[email protected]>
| * | Only replace NamedFieldList and add test for preserving Selfyanchith2019-03-181-13/+45
| | |
| * | Remove unachievable TODOyanchith2019-03-181-1/+0
| | |
| * | Implement naive version of fill_struct_fields assistyanchith2019-03-172-0/+122
| | |
* | | Merge #987bors[bot]2019-03-182-84/+70
|\ \ \ | | |/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 987: Refactor maybe_item to use Marker argument r=pcpthm a=pcpthm As suggested at <https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/980#issuecomment-473659745>. For expression paring functions, changing signature - from `fn(&mut Parser) -> Option<CompletedMarker>` to `fn(&mut Parser, Marker) -> Result<CompletedMarker, Marker>` - from `fn(&mut Parser) -> CompletedMarker` to `fn(&mut Parser, Marker) -> CompletedMarker` is my plan. Co-authored-by: pcpthm <[email protected]>
| * | Apply stylistic changes suggestedpcpthm2019-03-182-17/+14
| | |
| * | Refactor maybe_item to use Marker argumentpcpthm2019-03-172-86/+75
| | |
* | | Merge #982bors[bot]2019-03-173-17/+137
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 982: Implement BindingMode for pattern matching. r=flodiebold a=mjkillough Implement `BindingMode` for pattern matching, so that types can be correctly inferred using match ergonomics. The binding mode defaults to `Move` (referred to as 'BindingMode::BindByValue` in rustc), and is updated by automatic dereferencing of the value being matched. Fixes #888. - [Binding modes in The Reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html#binding-modes) - [`rustc` implementation](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e17c48e2f21eefd59748e364234efc7037a3ec96/src/librustc_typeck/check/_match.rs#L77) (and [definition of `BindingMode`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e957ed9d10ec589bdd523b88b4b44c41b1ecf763/src/librustc/ty/binding.rs)) - [Match Ergonomics RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2005-match-ergonomics.md#binding-mode-rules) Co-authored-by: Michael Killough <[email protected]>
| * | | Split test case and use tested_by!.Michael Killough2019-03-173-76/+103
| | | |
| * | | Simplify match statement.Michael Killough2019-03-171-6/+1
| | | |
| * | | impl Default for BindingMode.Michael Killough2019-03-171-5/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This decouples callers from knowing what the default binding mode of pattern matching is.
| * | | Implement BindingMode for pattern matching.Michael Killough2019-03-162-62/+154
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implement `BindingMode` for pattern matching, so that types can be correctly inferred using match ergonomics. The binding mode defaults to `Move` (referred to as 'BindingMode::BindByValue` in rustc), and is updated by automatic dereferencing of the value being matched.
* | | | Merge #983bors[bot]2019-03-173-0/+218
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 983: support remainder assignment operator r=matklad a=JeanMertz `%=` was returning errors for me, turns out it wasn't added as a valid assignment operation. I'm not sure what the best location would be to add a test for this. Please let me know and I'll add one. Co-authored-by: Jean Mertz <[email protected]>
| * | | | support remainder assignment operatorJean Mertz2019-03-173-0/+218
| | | | |
* | | | | Merge #986bors[bot]2019-03-174-133/+133
|\ \ \ \ \ | |_|_|/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 986: Fix parse tree of attribute on match arm r=matklad a=pcpthm ```rust match () { #[attr] () => (), } ``` Incorrect parse tree: `MatchArmList(Attr(..), MatchArm(..))`. Fixed: `MatchArmList(MatchArm(Attr(..), ...))`. Co-authored-by: pcpthm <[email protected]>
| * | | | Fix parse tree of attribute on match armpcpthm2019-03-174-133/+133
|/ / / /
* | | | Merge #985bors[bot]2019-03-171-57/+56
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 985: simplify parsing blocks a bit r=pcpthm a=matklad Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * | | | simplify parsing blocks a bitAleksey Kladov2019-03-171-57/+56
| | | | |
* | | | | Merge #984bors[bot]2019-03-173-1/+54
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 984: Allow attribute on struct literal field r=matklad a=pcpthm Cherrypicked from #980 Co-authored-by: pcpthm <[email protected]>
| * | | | Allow attribute on struct literal fieldpcpthm2019-03-173-1/+54
|/ / / /
* | | | Merge #968bors[bot]2019-03-1736-1954/+2053
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 968: Macro aware name resoltion r=matklad a=matklad The first commit lays the ground work for new name resolution, including * extracting position-indendent items from parse trees * walking the tree of modules * old-style macro_rules resolve cc @pnkfelix: this looks like an API name resolution should interact with. Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * | | | docsAleksey Kladov2019-03-171-9/+15
| | | | |
| * | | | remove fixmeAleksey Kladov2019-03-171-2/+1
| | | | |
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-12-30 05:38:11 +0000