| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7152: Implement hover for ConstParam r=Veykril a=Veykril
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7149: Implement hovering for TypeParams r=matklad a=Veykril
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
7148: Build aarch64-pc-windows-msvc releases r=matklad a=lnicola
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <[email protected]>
|
| |/ |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6587: SSR: Support statement matching and replacing r=davidlattimore a=MarijnS95
For #3186
Hi!
This is a smaller initial patchset that came up while working on support for statement lists (and my first time working on RA :grin:). It has me stuck on trailing semicolons for which I hope to receive some feedback. Matching (and replacing) `let` bindings with a trailing semicolon works fine, but trying to omit these (to make patterns more ergonomic) turns out more complex than expected.
The "optional trailing semicolon solution" implemented in this PR is ugly because `Matcher::attempt_match_token` should only consume a trailing `;` when parsing `let` bindings to prevent other code from breaking. That at the same time has a nasty side-effect of `;` ending up in the matched code: any replacements on that should include the trailing semicolon as well even if it was not in the pattern. A better example is in the tests:
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/3ae1649c24a689473b874c331f5f176e5839978e/crates/ssr/src/tests.rs#L178-L184
The end result to achieve is (I guess) allowing replacement of let bindings without trailing semicolon like `let x = $a ==>> let x = 1` (but including them on both sides is still fine), and should make replacement in a macro call (where `foo!(let a = 2;)` for a `$x:stmt` is invalid syntax) possible as well. That should allow to enable/fix these tests:
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/3ae1649c24a689473b874c331f5f176e5839978e/crates/ssr/src/tests.rs#L201-L214
A possible MVP of this PR might be to drop this optional `;' handling entirely and only allow an SSR pattern/template with semicolons on either side.
Co-authored-by: Marijn Suijten <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Adjusting `grammar::fragments::stmt` to Optional or Yes will break
original functionality and tests.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
7113: Manual updates r=matklad a=tekul
Add some details on how to build the manual and some clarification on how to deal with "proc macro2 warnings.
For context, this arose from [this question](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/how-to-disable-rust-analyzer-proc-macro-warnings-in-neovim/53150) on users.rust-lang.org.
Co-authored-by: Luke Taylor <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Added the error message to the doc for the UnresolvedProcMacro
diagnostic, explaining that either enabling the procMacro setting
or disabling this diagnostic should make the warnings go away.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
- Add link to asciidoc website
- Explain how to create the generated adoc files from the source code
- How to run asciidoctor to generate the manual
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
7138: Support assignment to FieldExpr for extract_assignment assist r=matklad a=Jesse-Bakker
Co-authored-by: Jesse Bakker <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
7139: Upgrade expect-test to 1.1 r=matklad a=Jesse-Bakker
Co-authored-by: Jesse Bakker <[email protected]>
|
|/ / / |
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
7137: Revert "Proper handling $crate and local_inner_macros" r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Reverts rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer#7133
It caused a fairly significant performance regression.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
7136: Fixed nested eager macro bug r=edwin0cheng a=edwin0cheng
fixes #7126
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
7068: Add VSCode command to view the hir of a function body r=theotherphil a=theotherphil
Will fix https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7061. Very rough initial version just to work out where I needed to wire everything up.
@matklad would you be happy merging a hir visualiser of some kind? If so, do you have any thoughts on what you'd like it show, and how?
I've spent very little time on this thus far, so I'm fine with throwing away the contents of this PR, but I want to avoid taking the time to make this more polished/interactive/useful only to discover that no-one else has any interest in this functionality.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1974256/103236081-bb58f700-493b-11eb-9d12-55ae1b870f8f.png)
Co-authored-by: Phil Ellison <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
7115: Migrate HasSource::source to return Option r=matklad a=nick96
I've made a start on fixing #6913 based on the provided work plan, migrating `HasSource::source` to return an `Option`. The simple cases are migrated but there are a few that I'm unsure exactly how they should be handled:
- Logging the processing of functions in `AnalysisStatsCmd::run`: In verbose mode it includes the path to the module containing the function and the syntax range. I've handled this with an if-let but would it be better to blow up here with `expect`? I'm not 100% on the code paths but if we're processing a function definition then the source should exist.
I've handled `source()` in all code paths as `None` being a valid return value but are there some cases where we should just blow up? Also, all I've done is bubble up the returned `None`s, there may be some places where we can recover and still provide something.
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fixes #6913
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
optional
They use source() which now returns an Option so they need to too.
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
simple as I thought
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The `LifetimeParam` and `Local` variants use `source()` to find their
range. Now that `source()` returns an `Option` we need to handle the
`None` case.
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
special cased
In #6901 some special case handling for proc-macros was introduced to
prevent panicing as they have no AST. Now the new HasSource::source
method is used that returns an option.
Generally this was a pretty trivial change, the only thing of much
interest is that `hir::MacroDef` now implements `TryToNav` not `ToNav`
as this allows us to handle `HasSource::source` now returning an option.
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
To start migrating HasSource::source to return an Option.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
7128: Implement HasAttrs for GenericParam r=matklad a=Veykril
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|