| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
The config now is mostly immutable, optimize for that.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Vertical code motions are conventionally called "pull up" / "push
down".
"extract" is used for introducing new names.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7115: Migrate HasSource::source to return Option r=matklad a=nick96
I've made a start on fixing #6913 based on the provided work plan, migrating `HasSource::source` to return an `Option`. The simple cases are migrated but there are a few that I'm unsure exactly how they should be handled:
- Logging the processing of functions in `AnalysisStatsCmd::run`: In verbose mode it includes the path to the module containing the function and the syntax range. I've handled this with an if-let but would it be better to blow up here with `expect`? I'm not 100% on the code paths but if we're processing a function definition then the source should exist.
I've handled `source()` in all code paths as `None` being a valid return value but are there some cases where we should just blow up? Also, all I've done is bubble up the returned `None`s, there may be some places where we can recover and still provide something.
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
simple as I thought
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
To start migrating HasSource::source to return an Option.
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7038: Fix type typo in add_missing_impl_members doc r=Veykril a=Veykril
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* simplify code
* correctly handle crate roots and mod.rs files (nested inline modules
are still mishandled)
* make sure that new text contains a trailing newline
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6746: Feature/add assist extract module to file r=matklad a=sasurau4
Fix #6522
## Screenshot
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13580199/102748269-33a44300-43a5-11eb-9e37-f5fcb8e62f73.gif" width=600 />
## TODO
- [x] Remove all TODO comment
- [x] Pass the doc test
Co-authored-by: Daiki Ihara <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Include adjacent whitespace in the text edits to remove the
parameter declaration and its occurences in calling code.
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6663
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6896: Node-ify lifetimes r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Let's see if this passes the tests 🤞
Depends on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/15
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6861: generate default implementation for an enum from an enum variant #6860 r=matklad a=bnjjj
close #6860
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6894: Parenthesize composite if condition before inverting in invert-if assist r=matklad a=Jesse-Bakker
Fixes #6867
Co-authored-by: Jesse Bakker <[email protected]>
|
| |/ |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6845: Don't HirDisplay unknown types when displaying for source r=Veykril a=Veykril
Was wondering why the add missing impl assist didn't do anything here:
![Code_JCA1Qo0V9P](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3757771/101990300-7af44a80-3ca6-11eb-8431-e5eb4de4e78c.png)
Turns out me forgetting to set the Index::Idx type in the trait causes RA to panic due to it trying to to create an unparsable type in the `make` module.
Now we get this instead which imo is definitely better to have.
![Code_MUFPJUCULY](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3757771/101990347-c9094e00-3ca6-11eb-9c6a-146bddf64b7c.png)
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6586: Don't call a closure a function in the infer_function_return_type assist label r=lnicola a=Veykril
`Add this function's return type` becomes `Add this closure's return type` for closures. This makes it more obvious that we are indeed planning on modifying the closure and not its containing function.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6553: Auto imports in completion r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
![completion](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/99155339-ae4fb380-26bf-11eb-805a-655b1706ce70.gif)
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/1062 but does not handle the completion order, since it's a separate task for https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4922 , https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4922 and maybe something else.
2 quirks in the current implementation:
* traits are not auto imported during method completion
If I understand the current situation right, we cannot search for traits by a **part** of a method name, we need a full name with correct case to get a trait for it.
* VSCode (?) autocompletion is not as rigid as in Intellij Rust as you can notice on the animation.
Intellij is able to refresh the completions on every new symbol added, yet VS Code does not query the completions on every symbol for me.
With a few debug prints placed in RA, I've observed the following behaviour: after the first set of completion suggestions is received, next symbol input does not trigger a server request, if the completions contain this symbol.
When more symbols added, the existing completion suggestions are filtered out until none are left and only then, on the next symbol it queries for completions.
It seems like the only alternative to get an updated set of results is to manually retrigger it with Esc and Ctrl + Space.
Despite the eerie latter bullet, the completion seems to work pretty fine and fast nontheless, but if you have any ideas on how to make it more smooth, I'll gladly try it out.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <[email protected]>
|