aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/hir/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Add static semantic token modifier for associated functions with no &selfAnatol Liu2020-11-051-5/+1
| | | | | | refactor logic into code_model.rs address comments
* Add static semantic token modifier for associated functions with no &selfAnatol Liu2020-11-051-1/+1
| | | | refactor logic into code_model.rs
* Add static semantic token modifier for associated functions with no &selfAnatol Liu2020-11-051-3/+20
| | | | refactor logic into code_model.rs
* Add static semantic token modifier for associated functions with no &selfAnatol Liu2020-11-051-0/+4
|
* Remove more unreachable pubsAleksey Kladov2020-11-024-16/+12
|
* Fix case where non FnOnce variables is marked callableGrayJack2020-10-261-1/+1
|
*-. Merge #6251 #6310bors[bot]2020-10-231-2/+23
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6251: Semantic Highlight: Add Callable modifier for variables r=matklad a=GrayJack This PR added the `HighlightModifier::Callable` variant and assigned it to variables and parameters that are fn pointers, closures and implements FnOnce trait. This allows to colorize these variables/parameters when used in call expression. 6310: Rewrite algo::diff to support insertion and deletion r=matklad a=Veykril This in turn also makes `algo::diff` generate finer diffs(maybe even minimal diffs?) as insertions and deletions aren't always represented as as replacements of parent nodes now. Required for #6287 to go on. Co-authored-by: GrayJack <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
| * | Add Callable modifier for variables that implements FnonceGrayJack2020-10-161-2/+23
| | |
* | | Diagnose #[cfg]s in bodiesJonas Schievink2020-10-231-0/+1
| |/ |/|
* | Rename UnconfiguredCode -> InactiveCodeJonas Schievink2020-10-201-1/+1
| |
* | Add a (hint) diagnostic for unconfigured itemsJonas Schievink2020-10-201-1/+1
| |
* | More type safety around namesAleksey Kladov2020-10-201-2/+2
| |
* | Rename declaration_name -> display_nameAleksey Kladov2020-10-201-2/+2
|/ | | | | | | | Declaration names sounds like a name of declaration -- something you can use for analysis. It empathically isn't, and is just a label displayed in various UI. It's important not to confuse the two, least we accidentally mix semantics with UI (I believe, there's already a case of this in the FamousDefs at least).
*-. Merge #6130 #6135bors[bot]2020-10-122-2/+25
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6130: Items case quick fix (snake_case / UPPER_SNAKE_CASE / CamelCase) r=matklad a=popzxc Resolves #4598. After a third try, it finally works. Boy, it appeared tougher than it seemed. Initially I thought like "Ha, `rustc` already tells us where idents are named incorrectly. It shouldn't be that hard, should it?". Well, the problems with the information provided by `rustc` appeared shortly: - `rustc` warnings are `flycheck` warnings, which are slightly aside from our diagnostics with fixes. When we map flycheck diagnostic to LSP, we can convert it into a fix, but only if it's marked as `Applicability::MachineApplicable`. Name case fix is marked `Applicability::MaybeIncorrect`, and for a reason: it only suggest to rename symbol under cursor, without tracking any references. - Warning spawned by `rustc` are identified by string labels rather than enum. It means that if one day the diagnostic will be renamed in `rustc`, `rust-analyzer` code will still compile, but won't find the required diagnostic by name anymore. If by chance this will happen when some unlucky guy will decide to create their first pull request, they'll be confused by suddenly failing tests (likely) not related to their changes. - Even if we'll try to build fixes atop of `rustc` warnings, we'll have to do it in the `rust_analyzer::diagnostics::to_proto` module, which is far less convenient for that matter than `ide` crate. That's why I decided that it's worth a separate `rust-analyzer` diagnostic, which will implement `DiagnosticWithFix` trait. After that, I discovered that currently `hir_ty::diagnostics` only check `DefWithBody` types, like function bodies. I had to add support for diagnostics which look at any `ModuleDef`. And of course, since I'd added a lot of new functionality, it required extensive testing. That explains why the diff is so big for a (looking) relatively small feature. I hope that this PR doesn't only add a small feature, but also creates a base for building another features. ## Example: ![case_quick_fix](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12111581/95008475-e07ee780-0622-11eb-9978-62a9ea0e7782.gif) P.S. My eyes were bleeding when I had to write the code for the example... 6135: when generating new function, focus on return type instead of body r=matklad a=bnjjj I made a little change when we use the assist to generate a new function, instead of focusing on the function body, it will focus on return type Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
| * | Apply case check diagnostic to impl itemsIgor Aleksanov2020-10-121-1/+2
| | |
| * | Add fix for incorrect case diagnosticIgor Aleksanov2020-10-122-26/+17
| | |
| * | Create basic support for names case checks and implement function name case ↵Igor Aleksanov2020-10-121-0/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | check
* | | Merge #6195bors[bot]2020-10-121-1/+5
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6195: Shorten iterators in associated params r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore Applies the same iterator-shortening logic to the iterator associated types, recursively. Before: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/95662735-e6ecf200-0b41-11eb-8e54-28493ad4e644.png) After: <img width="1192" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/95662894-e9038080-0b42-11eb-897d-527571ccac58.png"> Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <[email protected]>
| * | Also replace the associated types with iterKirill Bulatov2020-10-101-1/+5
| | |
* | | Merge #5917bors[bot]2020-10-121-0/+17
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5917: Add a command to open docs for the symbol under the cursor r=matklad a=zacps #### Todo - [ ] Decide if there should be a default keybind or context menu entry - [x] Figure out how to get the documentation path for methods and other non-top-level defs - [x] Design the protocol extension. In future we'll probably want parameters for local/remote documentation URLs, so that should maybe be done in this PR? - [x] Code organisation - [x] Tests Co-authored-by: Zac Pullar-Strecker <[email protected]>
| * | Remove methodowner & fix formattingZac Pullar-Strecker2020-10-082-40/+3
| | |
| * | Rebase fixesZac Pullar-Strecker2020-10-081-1/+1
| | |
| * | Change Option::Some bug to a fixme noteZac Pullar-Strecker2020-10-081-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | IMO this is too much work to be worth fixing at the moment.
| * | Differentiate method/tymethod by determining 'defaultness'Zac Pullar-Strecker2020-10-082-3/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently a method only has defaultness if it is a provided trait method, but this will change when specialisation is available and may need to become a concept known to hir. I opted to go for a 'fewest changes' approach given specialisation is still under development.
| * | Code reorganisation and field supportZac Pullar-Strecker2020-10-081-1/+47
| |/
* / Fix source_to_def for named enum variant fieldsJonas Schievink2020-10-091-0/+4
|/
* Shorten type hints for std::iter IteratorsLukas Wirth2020-10-062-3/+36
|
* Move ModPath->ast::Path function to IDE layerAleksey Kladov2020-10-061-5/+2
| | | | closes #6092
* Merge #6124bors[bot]2020-10-061-3/+3
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6124: Better normalized crate name usage r=jonas-schievink a=SomeoneToIgnore Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5343 Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5932 Uses normalized name for code snippets (to be able to test the fix), hover messages and documentation rewrite links (are there any tests for those?). Also renamed the field to better resemble the semantics. Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <[email protected]>
| * Properly name the fieldKirill Bulatov2020-10-021-2/+2
| |
| * Fix the hover dash issuesKirill Bulatov2020-10-021-2/+2
| |
* | Make ImportPrefix a configuration optionLukas Wirth2020-10-052-1/+3
| |
* | Make find_path_prefixed configurableLukas Wirth2020-10-051-1/+2
|/
* Minor clippy performance suggestionskjeremy2020-09-301-1/+1
|
* Don't unnecessarily unnest imports for import insertionLukas Wirth2020-09-251-0/+10
|
* Merge #5846bors[bot]2020-09-241-5/+31
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5846: Add references to fn args during completion r=matklad a=adamrk When completing a function call, if there is an argument taken as a ref or mut ref which matches the name and type of a variable in scope, we will insert a `&` or `&mut` when filling in the function arguments. This addresses https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5449. E.g. ```rust fn foo(x: &i32) {} fn main() { let x = 5; foo # completing foo here generates `foo(&x)` now instead of `foo(x)` } ``` Co-authored-by: adamrk <[email protected]>
| * Remove exposing unificationadamrk2020-09-021-6/+0
| |
| * Add back Param structadamrk2020-09-011-2/+12
| |
| * Add references to fn args during completionadamrk2020-08-301-6/+28
| |
* | Apply suggestions from code reviewAleksey Kladov2020-09-211-5/+5
| | | | | | Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <[email protected]>
* | Document SemanticScopeAleksey Kladov2020-09-211-0/+19
| |
* | Rename `CustomDerive` to `ProcMacro`Jonas Schievink2020-09-181-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | It handles fn-like macros too, and will handle attribute macros in the future
* | Merge #5971bors[bot]2020-09-131-0/+7
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5971: Implement async blocks r=flodiebold a=oxalica Fix #4018 @flodiebold already gave a generic guide in the issue. Here's some concern about implementation detail: - Chalk doesn't support generator type yet. - Adding generator type as a brand new type (ctor) can be complex and need to *re-introduced* builtin impls. (Like how we implement closures before native closure support of chalk, which is already removed in #5401 ) - The output type of async block should be known after type inference of the whole body. - We cannot directly get the type from source like return-positon-impl-trait. But we still need to provide trait bounds when chalk asking for `opaque_ty_data`. - During the inference, the output type of async block can be temporary unknown and participate the later inference. `let a = async { None }; let _: i32 = a.await.unwrap();` So in this PR, the type of async blocks is inferred as an opaque type parameterized by the `Future::Output` type it should be, like what we do with closure type. And it really works now. Well, I still have some questions: - The bounds `AsyncBlockImplType<T>: Future<Output = T>` is currently generated in `opaque_ty_data`. I'm not sure if we should put this code here. - Type of async block is now rendered as `impl Future<Output = OutputType>`. Do we need to special display to hint that it's a async block? Note that closure type has its special format, instead of `impl Fn(..) -> ..` or function type. Co-authored-by: oxalica <[email protected]>
| * | Fix type walking about type of async blockoxalica2020-09-111-0/+5
| | |
| * | Implement async blocksoxalica2020-09-101-0/+2
| |/
* / Rename record_field_pat to record_pat_fieldPavan Kumar Sunkara2020-09-102-6/+6
|/
* Tease apart orthogonal concerns in markdown link rewritingAleksey Kladov2020-08-264-320/+65
| | | | | | | | | | | | `hir` should know nothing about URLs, markdown and html. It should only be able to: * resolve stringy path from documentation * generate canonical stringy path for a def In contrast, link rewriting should not care about semantics of paths and names resolution, and should be concern only with text mangling bits.
* Remove monomorphisation from doclinks resolving codeAleksey Kladov2020-08-252-34/+43
|
* Remove AttrDefAleksey Kladov2020-08-254-66/+52
|
* SimplifyAleksey Kladov2020-08-251-6/+6
|
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-18 08:20:44 +0000