aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/hir_def
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* | Merge #8059bors[bot]2021-03-171-6/+39
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | 8059: Move doc-comment highlight injection from AST to HIR r=matklad,jonas-schievink a=Veykril Fixes #5016 Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
| * Remove quadratic attr source lookupLukas Wirth2021-03-171-0/+25
| |
| * Properly handle doc attributes in doc-comment highlight injectionLukas Wirth2021-03-161-1/+7
| |
| * Fix attribute index assignment in cfg_attr resolutionLukas Wirth2021-03-161-5/+7
| |
| * Move doc-comment highlight injection from AST to HIRLukas Wirth2021-03-161-1/+1
| |
* | Merge #8063bors[bot]2021-03-171-1/+1
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8063: couple clippy::complexity fixes r=matklad a=matthiaskrgr avoid redundant `.into()` calls to convert T into identical T (`let x: String = String::from("hello").into();`) use `if let Some(x)` instead of `.is_some()` + `.unwrap()` don't clone Copy types remove redundant wrapped ?s: `Some(Some(3)?)` can just be `Some(3)` use `.map(|x| y)` instead of `and_then(|x| Some(y)` on `Option`s Co-authored-by: Matthias Krüger <[email protected]>
| * | avoid converting types into themselves via .into() (clippy::useless-conversion)Matthias Krüger2021-03-171-1/+1
| |/ | | | | | | example: let x: String = String::from("hello world").into();
* | Merge #8048bors[bot]2021-03-177-46/+79
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8048: Fix missing unresolved macro diagnostic in function body r=edwin0cheng a=brandondong This was an issue I found while working on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7970. **Reproduction:** 1. Call a non-existent macro in a function body. ``` fn main() { foo!(); } ``` 2. No diagnostics are raised. An unresolved-macro-call diagnostic is expected. 3. If the macro call is instead outside of the function body, this works as expected. I believe this worked previously and regressed in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7805. **Behavior prior to https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7805:** - The unresolved-macro-call diagnostic did not exist. Instead, a macro-error diagnostic would be raised with the text "could not resolve macro [path]". - This was implemented by adding an error to the error sink (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7805/files#diff-50a326c5ae465bd9b31ee4310186380aa06e4fa1f6b41dbc0aed5bcc656a3cb8L657). - The error was propagated through https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/1a82af3527e476d52410ff4dfd2fb4c57466abcb/crates/hir_def/src/body.rs#L123 eventually reaching https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/1a82af3527e476d52410ff4dfd2fb4c57466abcb/crates/hir_def/src/body/lower.rs#L569. **Behavior after:** - Instead of writing to the error sink, an UnresolvedMacro error is now returned (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7805/files#diff-50a326c5ae465bd9b31ee4310186380aa06e4fa1f6b41dbc0aed5bcc656a3cb8R631). - The parent caller throws away the error as its function signature is `Option<MacroCallId>` (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7805/files#diff-50a326c5ae465bd9b31ee4310186380aa06e4fa1f6b41dbc0aed5bcc656a3cb8R604). - We instead now reach the warn condition (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/1a82af3527e476d52410ff4dfd2fb4c57466abcb/crates/hir_def/src/body.rs#L124) and no diagnostics are created in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/1a82af3527e476d52410ff4dfd2fb4c57466abcb/crates/hir_def/src/body/lower.rs#L575. **Fix:** - Make sure to propagate the UnresolvedMacro error. Report the error using the new unresolved-macro-call diagnostic. Co-authored-by: Brandon <[email protected]>
| * Follow established ErrorEmitted patternBrandon2021-03-172-16/+13
| |
| * Fix missing unresolved macro diagnostic in function bodyBrandon2021-03-167-39/+75
| |
| |
| \
*-. \ Merge #7900 #8000bors[bot]2021-03-165-20/+77
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7900: show function params in completion detail r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan This resolves #7842 by updating the detail for function completions from `-> T` to `fn(T, U) -> V`. I added an expicit unit test for this, `ide_completion::render::fn_detail_includes_args_and_return_type`, which passes. Lots of other unit tests fail (~60 of them) due to this change, although I believe the failures are purely cosmetic (they were testing the exact format of this output). I'm happy to go update those tests, but before I do that I'd like to make sure this is in fact the format we want for the detail? edit - I realized `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo test` automatically updates `expect!` tests. Big :+1: to whoever worked on that! So I'll go ahead and update all these tests soon. But I still would like to confirm `fn(T, U) -> V` is the desired content in the `detail` field. 8000: Use hir formatter for hover text r=matklad a=oxalica Fix #2765 , (should) fix #4665 Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: oxalica <[email protected]>
| | * | Use hir formatter moreoxalica2021-03-154-7/+27
| | | |
| | * | Impl HirDisplay for function hover messageoxalica2021-03-151-1/+10
| | | |
| | * | Introduce FunctionQualifier for hir::FunctionDataoxalica2021-03-153-12/+40
| | | |
* | | | Fix macro expansion for statements w/o semicolonEdwin Cheng2021-03-162-47/+63
| |_|/ |/| |
* | | Merge #7970bors[bot]2021-03-153-11/+69
|\ \ \ | |_|/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7970: Fix incorrect diagnostics for failing built in macros r=jonas-schievink a=brandondong **Reproduction:** 1. Use a built in macro in such a way that rust-analyzer fails to expand it. For example: **lib.rs** ``` include!("<valid file but without a .rs extension so it is not indexed by rust-analyzer>"); ``` 2. rust-analyzer highlights the macro call and says the macro itself cannot be resolved even though include! is in the standard library (unresolved-macro-call diagnostic). 3. No macro-error diagnostic is raised. **Root cause for incorrect unresolved-macro-call diagnostic:** 1. collector:collect_macro_call is able to resolve include! in legacy scope but the expansion fails. Therefore, it's pushed into unexpanded_macros to be retried with module scope. 2. include! fails at the resolution step in collector:resolve_macros now that it's using module scope. Therefore, it's retained in unexpanded_macros. 3. Finally, collector:finish tries resolving the remaining unexpanded macros but only with module scope. include! again fails at the resolution step so a diagnostic is created. **Root cause for missing macro-error diagnostic:** 1. In collector:resolve_macros, directive.legacy is None since eager expansion failed in collector:collect_macro_call. The macro_call_as_call_id fails to resolve since we're retrying in module scope. Therefore, collect_macro_expansion is not called for the macro and no macro-error diagnostic is generated. **Fix:** - In collector:collect_macro_call, do not add failing built-in macros to the unexpanded_macros list and immediately raise the macro-error diagnostic. This is in contrast to lazy macros which are resolved in collector::resolve_macros and later expanded in collect_macro_expansion where a macro-error diagnostic may be raised. Co-authored-by: Brandon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: brandondong <[email protected]>
| * | Update crates/hir_def/src/nameres/collector.rsbrandondong2021-03-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
| * | Fix incorrect diagnositics for failing built in eager macrosBrandon2021-03-142-10/+68
| | |
| * | Fix spelling errorBrandon2021-03-141-1/+1
| |/
* | Enable thread-local coverage marksLaurențiu Nicola2021-03-151-1/+1
| |
* | Simplify source maps for fieldsAleksey Kladov2021-03-152-18/+25
| |
* | Create TraitEnvironment through a queryFlorian Diebold2021-03-131-0/+10
| |
* | Handle `cfg_attr` gating multiple attributesJonas Schievink2021-03-131-29/+19
| |
* | Extend cfg_attr testJonas Schievink2021-03-131-0/+3
| |
* | Simplify hir_def TestDBJonas Schievink2021-03-131-7/+2
| |
* | Remove `ItemTree::source`Jonas Schievink2021-03-121-12/+0
|/ | | | `HasSource` should be used instead
* Prefer names from outer DefMap over extern preludeJonas Schievink2021-03-101-5/+11
|
* Stop fetching ItemTrees for no reasonJonas Schievink2021-03-101-14/+1
|
* Compilation speedAleksey Kladov2021-03-091-1/+1
|
* Delete `ContainerId`Jonas Schievink2021-03-096-72/+45
|
* Stop using `ContainerId` in `AssocContainerId`Jonas Schievink2021-03-093-7/+7
|
* Check ancestor maps when computing traits in scopeJonas Schievink2021-03-091-0/+10
|
* Remove `item_scope` field from `Body`Jonas Schievink2021-03-093-175/+6
|
* Use `body.block_scopes` in `ChildBySource`Jonas Schievink2021-03-091-1/+5
|
* Store inner `BlockId`s in `Body`Jonas Schievink2021-03-092-1/+6
|
* Change `ChildBySource` to allow reusing `DynMap`Jonas Schievink2021-03-092-32/+18
|
* Use upstream cov-markLaurențiu Nicola2021-03-0821-73/+58
|
* Do not process indexed values more than onceKirill Bulatov2021-03-081-29/+31
|
* Deduplicate search_dependencies resultsKirill Bulatov2021-03-081-18/+19
|
* Rename a few `crate_def_map`s to `def_map`Jonas Schievink2021-03-063-16/+16
| | | | These could all be block `DefMap`s instead of crate-level `DefMap`s
* Make two calls virtualLaurențiu Nicola2021-03-051-1/+1
|
* Fix some warningsLaurențiu Nicola2021-03-051-1/+1
|
* Remove incorrect broken testJonas Schievink2021-03-031-24/+0
| | | | | `Struct` cannot be named at all in that position, since `super` doesn't resolve to the block scope
* Fix `find_path` when inner items are presentJonas Schievink2021-03-014-28/+88
|
* Merge #7778bors[bot]2021-03-011-2/+11
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7778: Fix lowering trailing self paths in UseTrees r=Veykril a=Veykril Noticed that hovering over `self` in a use tree like `use foo::bar::{self}` showing documentation and such for the current module instead of `bar`. Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
| * Fix lowering trailing self paths in UseTreesLukas Wirth2021-02-281-2/+11
| |
* | Merge #7804bors[bot]2021-02-283-79/+73
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7804: Introduce TypeCtor::Scalar r=lnicola a=Veykril `TypeCtor::Int(..) | TypeCtor::Float(..) | TypeCtor::Char | TypeCtor::Bool` => `TypeCtor::Scalar(..)`, in this case we can actually just straight up use `chalk_ir::Scalar` already since its just a POD without any IDs or anything. Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
| * | Introduce TypeCtor::ScalarLukas Wirth2021-02-283-79/+73
| |/
* | For unresolved macros, hightlight only the last segmentAleksey Kladov2021-02-285-92/+147
| |
* | Restrict visibilities to the containing DefMapJonas Schievink2021-02-282-4/+46
|/