| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
* rename ConstExtension->ConstExt
* refactor a manual construction of a Const
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #2922: add unknown length as a condition for a type having unknown.
Incorporate reviews:
* Extract some of the const evaluation workings into functions
* Add fixmes on the hacks
* Add tests for impls on specific array lengths (these work!!! 😁)
* Add tests for const generics (indeed we don't support it yet)
|
|
|
|
| |
Now we will get the type of `[0u8; 4]`.
|
|
|
|
| |
I am not confident that my added byte string parsing is right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now e.g.
```rust
fn a(b: [u8; 2]) {
}
```
will know about the length of b.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8799: Add basic support for array lengths in types r=flodiebold a=lf-
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
|
|/
|
|
| |
Fixes #8378
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chalk isn't really a 'traits' thing anymore, so it doesn't make sense to
have all the Chalk-related stuff in submodules of `traits`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(Costs a bit of performance, reduces memory usage on RA by ~10%.)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Almost all uses actually only care about ADT substs, so it's better to
be explicit. The methods were a bad abstraction anyway since they
already didn't include the inner types of e.g. `TyKind::Ref` anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It stores no useful data, since we can derive all fields from
`variant_resolutions`
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8364: Memory usage improvements r=jonas-schievink a=alexmaco
These are mostly focused on splitting up enum variants with large size differences between variants by `Box`-ing things up.
In my testing this reduces the memory usage somewhere in the low percentages, even though the measurements are quite noisy.
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Macovei <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
64bit systems)
Rationale: only a minority of variants used almost half the size.
By keeping large members (especially in Option) behind a box
the memory cost is only payed when the large variants are needed.
This reduces the size Vec<Expr> needs to allocate.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- don't shift in/out for Chalk mapping (we want to have the same
binders now)
- do shift in when creating the signature for a closure (though it
shouldn't matter much)
- do shift in when lowering a `fn()` type
- correctly deal with the implied binder in TypeWalk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I probably want to get rid of this function completely later.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- all the types that will be replaced by Chalk go to `types`
- `TypeWalk` impls go to `walk`
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
... since that's the actual method on Chalk side that matches the signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Plus some more adaptations to Substitution.
Lots of `assert_ty_ref` that we should revisit when introducing
lifetime/const parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is just the most trivial check: If no inference variables have been
updated, and there are no new obligations, we can just skip trying to
solve them again. We could be smarter about it, but this already helps
quite a bit, and I don't want to touch this too much before we replace
the inference table by Chalk's.
Fixes #8263 (well, improves it quite a bit).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have a bug where type-checking `per_query_memory_usage` takes a
couple of seconds. It also reveals another bug: our type inference is
not cancellable.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7907: Autoderef with visibility r=cynecx a=cynecx
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7841.
I am not sure about the general approach here. Right now this simply tries to check whether the autoderef candidate is reachable from the current module. ~~However this doesn't exactly work with traits (see the `tests::macros::infer_derive_clone_in_core` test, which fails right now).~~ see comment below
Refs:
- `rustc_typeck` checking fields: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/66ec64ccf31883cd2c28d045912a76179c0c6ed2/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs#L1610
r? @flodiebold
Co-authored-by: cynecx <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8139: Align `Canonical` and `InEnvironment` with the Chalk versions r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This in particular means storing a chalk_ir::Environment, not our
TraitEnvironment. This makes InEnvironment not usable for Type, where we
need to keep the full TraitEnvironment.
|
|\| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8136: Introduce QuantifiedWhereClause and DynTy analogous to Chalk r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This introduces a bunch of new binders in lots of places, which we have to be careful about, but we had to add them at some point. There's a lot of skipping of the binders; once we're done with the Chalk move, we should review the remaining ones.
8146: Document patch policy r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Still far too much binder skipping going on; I find it hard to imagine
this is all correct, but the tests pass.
|