aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/hir_ty/src/infer
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Properly infer tuple patterns when encountering ellipsisLukas Wirth2020-11-241-8/+17
|
* Remove more unreachable pubsAleksey Kladov2020-11-021-1/+1
|
* Deny unreachable-pubAleksey Kladov2020-11-022-14/+23
| | | | | | | | It's very useful when `pub` is equivalent to "this is crate's public API", let's enforce this! Ideally, we should enforce it for local `cargo test`, and only during CI, but that needs https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/5034.
* binary operator overload type inference: add test markRoland Ruckerbauer2020-10-141-0/+3
|
* Implement binary operator overloading type inferenceRoland Ruckerbauer2020-10-131-4/+11
|
* Merge #5971bors[bot]2020-09-131-2/+9
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5971: Implement async blocks r=flodiebold a=oxalica Fix #4018 @flodiebold already gave a generic guide in the issue. Here's some concern about implementation detail: - Chalk doesn't support generator type yet. - Adding generator type as a brand new type (ctor) can be complex and need to *re-introduced* builtin impls. (Like how we implement closures before native closure support of chalk, which is already removed in #5401 ) - The output type of async block should be known after type inference of the whole body. - We cannot directly get the type from source like return-positon-impl-trait. But we still need to provide trait bounds when chalk asking for `opaque_ty_data`. - During the inference, the output type of async block can be temporary unknown and participate the later inference. `let a = async { None }; let _: i32 = a.await.unwrap();` So in this PR, the type of async blocks is inferred as an opaque type parameterized by the `Future::Output` type it should be, like what we do with closure type. And it really works now. Well, I still have some questions: - The bounds `AsyncBlockImplType<T>: Future<Output = T>` is currently generated in `opaque_ty_data`. I'm not sure if we should put this code here. - Type of async block is now rendered as `impl Future<Output = OutputType>`. Do we need to special display to hint that it's a async block? Note that closure type has its special format, instead of `impl Fn(..) -> ..` or function type. Co-authored-by: oxalica <[email protected]>
| * Implement async blocksoxalica2020-09-101-2/+9
| |
* | Implement box pattern inferenceJonas Schievink2020-09-121-1/+13
| |
* | Rename record_field_pat to record_pat_fieldPavan Kumar Sunkara2020-09-101-1/+1
|/
* Rename ra_hir_ty -> hir_tyAleksey Kladov2020-08-135-0/+2072