aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/hir_ty/src/traits
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Upgrade Chalk to 0.36Florian Diebold2020-10-304-316/+176
| | | | Quite a few changes, because Chalk got rid of the `ApplicationTy` nesting.
* Get rid of FAKE_PLACEHOLDERFlorian Diebold2020-10-251-8/+9
| | | | | The lifetime placeholder can be replaced by the static lifetime, and for array sizes we should just be using a concrete const.
* Make unimplemented match variants explicitCasey Primozic2020-10-071-1/+2
|
* `todo!()` -> `unimplemented!() // FIXME` for CICasey Primozic2020-10-062-3/+5
|
* Bump chalk to use latest git to get fixCasey Primozic2020-10-062-0/+13
| | | | * Chalk very recently (like an hour ago) merged a fix that prevents rust analyzer from panicking. This allows it to be usable again for code that hits those situations. See #6134, #6145, Probably #6120
* Update chalk to 0.28.0Bram van den Heuvel2020-09-251-2/+8
|
* Update chalk to 0.27 and adapt to chalk changes.Charles Lew2020-09-154-27/+76
|
* Merge #5971bors[bot]2020-09-132-21/+87
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5971: Implement async blocks r=flodiebold a=oxalica Fix #4018 @flodiebold already gave a generic guide in the issue. Here's some concern about implementation detail: - Chalk doesn't support generator type yet. - Adding generator type as a brand new type (ctor) can be complex and need to *re-introduced* builtin impls. (Like how we implement closures before native closure support of chalk, which is already removed in #5401 ) - The output type of async block should be known after type inference of the whole body. - We cannot directly get the type from source like return-positon-impl-trait. But we still need to provide trait bounds when chalk asking for `opaque_ty_data`. - During the inference, the output type of async block can be temporary unknown and participate the later inference. `let a = async { None }; let _: i32 = a.await.unwrap();` So in this PR, the type of async blocks is inferred as an opaque type parameterized by the `Future::Output` type it should be, like what we do with closure type. And it really works now. Well, I still have some questions: - The bounds `AsyncBlockImplType<T>: Future<Output = T>` is currently generated in `opaque_ty_data`. I'm not sure if we should put this code here. - Type of async block is now rendered as `impl Future<Output = OutputType>`. Do we need to special display to hint that it's a async block? Note that closure type has its special format, instead of `impl Fn(..) -> ..` or function type. Co-authored-by: oxalica <[email protected]>
| * Fix and prettify commentsoxalica2020-09-111-4/+6
| |
| * Implement async blocksoxalica2020-09-102-21/+85
| |
* | Tweak interner for chalkNathan Whitaker2020-09-091-9/+9
| |
* | Lookup ADT and assoc. type names for chalk debugNathan Whitaker2020-09-092-5/+21
|/
* Lookup adt namesWilco Kusee2020-08-141-1/+2
|
* Print chalk programs in debug outputWilco Kusee2020-08-141-10/+12
|
* Rename ra_hir_ty -> hir_tyAleksey Kladov2020-08-134-0/+2114