| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8813: Get some more array lengths! r=lf- a=lf-
This is built on #8799 and thus contains its changes. I'll rebase it onto master when that one gets merged. It adds support for r-a understanding the length of:
* `let a: [u8; 2] = ...`
* `let a = b"aaa"`
* `let a = [0u8; 4]`
I have added support for getting the values of byte strings, which was not previously there. I am least confident in the correctness of this part and it probably needs some more tests, as we currently have only one test that exercised that part (!).
Fixes #2922.
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* rename ConstExtension->ConstExt
* refactor a manual construction of a Const
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix #2922: add unknown length as a condition for a type having unknown.
Incorporate reviews:
* Extract some of the const evaluation workings into functions
* Add fixmes on the hacks
* Add tests for impls on specific array lengths (these work!!! 😁)
* Add tests for const generics (indeed we don't support it yet)
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Now we will get the type of `[0u8; 4]`.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I am not confident that my added byte string parsing is right.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Now e.g.
```rust
fn a(b: [u8; 2]) {
}
```
will know about the length of b.
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8799: Add basic support for array lengths in types r=flodiebold a=lf-
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8398: Fix inference with conditionally compiled tails r=flodiebold a=DJMcNab
Fixes #8378
Co-authored-by: Daniel McNab <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #8378
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This isn't actually how it works, you have to specify the exact trait
that has the associated type.
Fixes #8686.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Doesn't fix the bug I was trying to fix, but now that I did it anyway it
seems fine to keep.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
closes #8604
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8462: Expand macros at type position r=jonas-schievink a=cynecx
Co-authored-by: cynecx <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8539: fix: Do not propose inherent traits in flyimports and import assists r=flodiebold a=SomeoneToIgnore
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8520
I've went with a separate method approach, since the [highlighted code](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8520#issuecomment-819856337) has not`Type` and uses `Ty` to get his data, but the code I had to change has no access to `Ty` and has `Type` only.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This condition should always be true for *valid* code, but of course
there might be invalid code or things that we can't currently resolve.
Fixes #8464.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8465: Include more info in assert r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This helped find https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8464
changelog skip
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|