| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The root cause was that we forgot to add bindings from the arm to the
guard expression
closes #3980
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #3977.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
4012: fix panic on ellipsis in pattern r=flodiebold a=JoshMcguigan
fixes #3999
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It's not entirely clear what subnode ranges should mean in the
presence of macros, so let's leave them out for now. We are not using
them heavily anyway.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
closes #2799
|
| |/ |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
3966: Add support for bounds on associated types in trait definitions r=matklad a=flodiebold
E.g.
```rust
trait Trait {
type Item: SomeOtherTrait;
}
```
Note that these don't simply desugar to where clauses; as I understand it, where clauses have to be proved by the *user* of the trait, but these bounds are proved by the *implementor*. (Also, where clauses on associated types are unstable.)
(Another one from my recursive solver branch...)
3968: Remove format from syntax_bridge hot path r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
Although only around 1% speed up by running:
```
Measure-Command {start-process .\target\release\rust-analyzer "analysis-stats -q ." -NoNewWindow -wait}
```
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
E.g.
```
trait Trait {
type Item: SomeOtherTrait;
}
```
Note that these don't simply desugar to where clauses; as I understand it, where
clauses have to be proved by the *user* of the trait, but these bounds are proved
by the *implementor*. (Also, where clauses on associated types are unstable.)
|
| | | | | |
| | \ \ | |
| |\ \ \ \
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
3964: Nicer Chalk debug logs r=matklad a=flodiebold
I'm looking at a lot of Chalk debug logs at the moment, so here's a few changes to make them slightly nicer...
3965: Implement inline associated type bounds r=matklad a=flodiebold
Like `Iterator<Item: SomeTrait>`.
This is an unstable feature, but it's used in the standard library e.g. in the definition of Flatten, so we can't get away with not implementing it :)
(This is cherry-picked from my recursive solver branch, where it works better, but I did manage to write a test that works with the current Chalk solver as well...)
3967: Handle `Self::Type` in trait definitions when referring to own associated type r=matklad a=flodiebold
It was implemented for other generic parameters for the trait, but not for `Self`.
(Last one off my recursive solver branch :smile: )
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Like `Iterator<Item: SomeTrait>`.
This is an unstable feature, but it's used in the standard library e.g. in the
definition of Flatten, so we can't get away with not implementing it :)
|
| |/ / |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The grammar now looks like this
[name_ref :] pat
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
3925: Implement assist "Reorder field names" r=matklad a=geoffreycopin
This PR implements the "Reorder record fields" assist as discussed in issue #3821 .
Adding a `RecordFieldPat` variant to the `Pat` enum seemed like the easiest way to handle the `RecordPat` children as a single sequence of elements, maybe there is a better way ?
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Copin <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We used
name [: expr]
grammar before, now it is
[name :] expr
which makes things simpler
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
3918: Add support for feature attributes in struct literal r=matklad a=bnjjj
As promised here is the next PR to solve 2 different scenarios with feature flag on struct literal.
close #3870
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | |\
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| |
| | |
I think this makes is more clear which things are : AstNode and which
are : AstToken
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We treat macro calls as expressions (there's appropriate Into impl),
which causes problem if there's expresison and non-expression macro in
the same node (like in the match arm).
We fix this problem by nesting macor patterns into another node (the
same way we nest path into PathExpr or PathPat). Ideally, we probably
should add a similar nesting for macro expressions, but that needs
some careful thinking about macros in blocks: `{ am_i_expression!() }`.
|
| |
|
|
| |
value
|
| | |
|
