Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Fix coercion from &Foo to an inference variable in a reference | Florian Diebold | 2019-12-08 | 1 | -0/+37 |
| | | | | We didn't try to unify within the reference, but we should. | ||||
* | Don't unify within a reference | Florian Diebold | 2019-12-06 | 1 | -0/+36 |
| | | | | | | | If we are expecting a `&Foo` and get a `&something`, when checking the `something`, we are *expecting* a `Foo`, but we shouldn't try to unify whatever we get with that expectation, because it could actually be a `&Foo`, and `&&Foo` coerces to `&Foo`. So this fixes quite a few false type mismatches. | ||||
* | Move Ty | Aleksey Kladov | 2019-11-27 | 1 | -0/+369 |