aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/ra_ide/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* | Introduce EffectExprAleksey Kladov2020-05-024-46/+38
| |
* | Test for unsafe traitDiana2020-05-011-0/+11
| |
* | Unsafe traitsDiana2020-05-011-1/+5
| |
* | Fix a bunch of false-positives in join-linesAleksey Kladov2020-04-301-0/+66
| |
* | Merge #4210bors[bot]2020-04-302-0/+65
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4210: Include function qualifiers in signature r=matklad a=oxalica Fixes #2450 It seems there's no test for `ra_ide/display/{short_label,function_signature}`. I'm not sure how to setup it. Manually tested: <img width="428" alt="Screenshot_20200430_004434" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14816024/80622769-d6f1c200-8a7b-11ea-91f3-e94bfb2703c5.png"> Co-authored-by: oxalica <[email protected]>
| * | Add tests of showing function qualifiersoxalica2020-04-301-0/+25
| | |
| * | Include function qualifiers in signatureoxalica2020-04-291-0/+40
| | |
* | | if let -> matchJonas Schievink2020-04-291-4/+3
| | |
* | | Complete assoc. items on type parametersJonas Schievink2020-04-291-11/+262
|/ /
* | Better filtering of qualified enum variants in completionAleksey Kladov2020-04-292-9/+49
| |
* | Complete union fields after dotJonas Schievink2020-04-281-0/+38
|/
* Introduce new semantic highlight token for format specifierLeander Tentrup2020-04-287-36/+43
|
* Precompute expected type during completionAleksey Kladov2020-04-263-35/+44
|
* Fix broken testJonas Schievink2020-04-251-1/+1
|
* Don't add call parens when an fn type is expectedJonas Schievink2020-04-251-0/+56
|
* Merge #4133bors[bot]2020-04-251-4/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4133: main: eagerly prime goto-definition caches r=matklad a=BurntSushi This commit eagerly primes the caches used by goto-definition by submitting a "phantom" goto-definition request. This is perhaps a bit circuitous, but it does actually get the job done. The result of this change is that once RA is finished its initial loading of a project, goto-definition requests are instant. There don't appear to be any more surprise latency spikes. This _partially_ addresses #1650 in that it front-loads the latency of the first goto-definition request, which in turn makes it more predictable and less surprising. In particular, this addresses the use case where one opens the text editor, starts reading code for a while, and only later issues the first goto-definition request. Before this PR, that first goto-definition request is guaranteed to have high latency in any reasonably sized project. But after this PR, there's a good chance that it will now be instant. What this _doesn't_ address is that initial loading time. In fact, it makes it longer by adding a phantom goto-definition request to the initial startup sequence. However, I observed that while this did make initial loading slower, it was overall a somewhat small (but not insignificant) fraction of initial loading time. ----- At least, the above is what I _want_ to do. The actual change in this PR is just a proof-of-concept. I came up with after an evening of printf-debugging. Once I found the spot where this cache priming should go, I was unsure of how to generate a phantom input. So I just took an input I knew worked from my printf-debugging and hacked it in. Obviously, what I'd like to do is make this more general such that it will always work. I don't know whether this is the "right" approach or not. My guess is that there is perhaps a cleaner solution that more directly primes whatever cache is being lazily populated rather than fudging the issue with a phantom goto-definition request. I created this as a draft PR because I'd really like help making this general. I think whether y'all want to accept this patch is perhaps a separate question. IMO, it seems like a good idea, but to be honest, I'm happy to maintain this patch on my own since it's so trivial. But I would like to generalize it so that it will work in any project. My thinking is that all I really need to do is find a file and a token somewhere in the loaded project, and then use that as input. But I don't quite know how to connect all the data structures to do that. Any help would be appreciated! cc @matklad since I've been a worm in your ear about this problem. :-) Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <[email protected]>
| * main: eagerly prime goto-definition cachesAndrew Gallant2020-04-251-4/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit makes RA more aggressive about eagerly priming the caches. In particular, this fixes an issue where even after RA was done priming its caches, an initial goto-definition request would have very high latency. This fixes that issue by requesting syntax highlighting for everything. It is presumed that this is a tad wasteful, but not overly so. This commit also tweaks the logic that determines when the cache is primed. Namely, instead of just priming it when the state is loaded initially, we attempt to prime it whenever some state changes. This fixes an issue where if a modification notification is seen before cache priming is done, it would stop the cache priming early.
* | Rename StructField -> FieldAleksey Kladov2020-04-256-14/+9
| |
* | text-size 1.0.0Aleksey Kladov2020-04-251-6/+6
| |
* | CleanupsAleksey Kladov2020-04-251-8/+5
| |
* | Convert tests to text-sizeAleksey Kladov2020-04-2530-1221/+1190
| |
* | Convert code to text-sizeAleksey Kladov2020-04-2520-100/+96
|/
* Merge #4128bors[bot]2020-04-241-1/+52
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4128: Include correct item path for variant completions r=matklad a=jonas-schievink The test would previously suggest `E::V`, which is not enough to name the variant as the enum is in a module. Now it correctly suggests the full path `m::E::V`. Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
| * Include correct item path for variant completionsJonas Schievink2020-04-241-1/+52
| |
| |
| \
*-. \ Merge #3998 #4006bors[bot]2020-04-244-56/+324
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg Additional feature for #3639 - [x] Add tests for paths with more segments - [x] Make generating the function in another file work - [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module - [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file - [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper 4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`. The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct. The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions. There are a few places which I am not quite sure: - Is the way I extract the macro names correct? - Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`? Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome! Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <[email protected]>
| | * | Adapt format specifier highlighting to support escaped squences and unicode ↵Leander Tentrup2020-04-223-22/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | identifiers
| | * | Apply suggestions from code reviewLeander Tentrup2020-04-221-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Co-Authored-By: bjorn3 <[email protected]>
| | * | Implement syntax highlighting for format stringsLeander Tentrup2020-04-203-3/+208
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Detailed changes: 1) Implement a lexer for string literals that divides the string in format specifier `{}` including the format specifier modifier. 2) Adapt syntax highlighting to add ranges for the detected sequences. 3) Add a test case for the format string syntax highlighting.
| | * | Refactor flattening logic for highlighted syntax rangesLeander Tentrup2020-04-181-54/+85
| | | |
| * | | Add target file information to AssistActionTimo Freiberg2020-04-211-0/+4
| | | |
* | | | Don't omit methods with self from path completionJonas Schievink2020-04-241-6/+38
| |_|/ |/| |
* | | Adds attribute completions (#3941)Roberto Vidal2020-04-244-0/+594
| | |
* | | Better label for macros completionAleksey Kladov2020-04-245-48/+59
| | |
* | | Honor snippet capabilityAleksey Kladov2020-04-241-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | closes #2518
* | | Make sure that adding a snippet requires corresponding capabilityAleksey Kladov2020-04-246-44/+107
| | |
* | | Introduce internal snippet capAleksey Kladov2020-04-241-0/+13
| | |
* | | Move CompletionConfig to a separate moduleAleksey Kladov2020-04-242-19/+20
| | |
* | | Add test marksAleksey Kladov2020-04-242-0/+6
| | |
* | | Introduce ActiveParameterAleksey Kladov2020-04-245-30/+35
| | |
* | | Move tests to where they belongAleksey Kladov2020-04-242-231/+231
| | |
* | | RefactorAleksey Kladov2020-04-241-24/+18
| | |
* | | Restore CompletionItem immutabilityAleksey Kladov2020-04-242-31/+23
| | |
* | | More functionalAleksey Kladov2020-04-242-11/+18
| | |
* | | MoveAleksey Kladov2020-04-231-9/+9
| | |
* | | Merge #3954bors[bot]2020-04-237-28/+388
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3954: Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name r=matklad a=bnjjj This tweet (https://twitter.com/tjholowaychuk/status/1248918374731714560) gaves me the idea to implement that in rust-analyzer. Basically for this first example I made some examples when we are in a function call definition. I look on the parameter list to prioritize autocompletions for the same types and if it's the same type + the same name then it's displayed first in the completion list. So here is a draft, first step to open a discussion and know what you think about the implementation. It works (cf tests) but maybe I can make a better implementation at some places. Be careful the code needs some refactoring to be better and concise. PS: It was lot of fun writing this haha Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
| * | | Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and nameBenjamin Coenen2020-04-211-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
| * | | Merge branch 'master' of github.com:rust-analyzer/rust-analyzerBenjamin Coenen2020-04-217-27/+52
| |\| |
| * | | Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and nameBenjamin Coenen2020-04-214-48/+47
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
| * | | Merge branch 'master' of github.com:rust-analyzer/rust-analyzerBenjamin Coenen2020-04-187-18/+140
| |\ \ \ | | | |/ | | |/|
| * | | feat: improve dot completions with scoringBenjamin Coenen2020-04-171-5/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <[email protected]>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-27 11:04:03 +0000