| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
2843: Add inlay parameter name hints for call expr r=matklad a=imtsuki
This patch adds Intellij-like parameter name hints for literal values in function calls.
<img width="624" alt="Screenshot" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8423594/72366533-68d7f800-3735-11ea-9279-cf193ca8ca2f.png">
Signed-off-by: imtsuki <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: imtsuki <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: imtsuki <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: imtsuki <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: imtsuki <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
macro call and macro definition
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
where first token != "macro_rules"
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Flag to hide cargo.toml not found error
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
2772: Actually test references r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
This will be a little more work when `ReferenceSearchResults` change but I think it's easier to maintain in the end. It also follows a similar pattern to navigation targets and call hierarchy.
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Kolb <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Let's be always explicit whether we create a library (i.e., an immutable
dependency) or a local `SourceRoot`, since it can have a large impact on
the validation performance in salsa. (we found it the hard way recently,
where the `Default` instance made it quite tricky to spot a bug)
Signed-off-by: Michal Terepeta <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
See: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-languageserver-node/blob/master/protocol/src/protocol.callHierarchy.proposed.ts
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Reject tuple index for missing fields assist
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When processing a change with added libraries, we used
`Default::default` for `SourceRoot` which sets `is_library` to false.
Since we use `is_library` to decide whether to use low or high
durability, I believe that this caused us to mark many library
dependencies as having low durability and thus increased the size of the
graph that salsa needed to verify on every change.
Based on my initial tests this speeds up the `CrateDefMapQuery` on
rust-analyzer from about ~64ms to ~14ms and reduces the number of
validations for the query from over 60k to about 7k.
Signed-off-by: Michal Terepeta <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is the same change as we did with `crate_def_map` and it does seem
that we mostly spend time in salsa, without recomputing much on
rust-analyzer side.
Example output:
```
233ms - handle_inlay_hints
163ms - get_inlay_hints
163ms - SourceAnalyzer::new
67ms - def_with_body_from_child_node
67ms - analyze_container
67ms - analyze_container
67ms - Module::from_definition
67ms - Module::from_file
67ms - crate_def_map
0ms - parse_macro_query (6 calls)
0ms - raw_items_query (1 calls)
66ms - ???
0ms - crate_def_map (1 calls)
0ms - crate_def_map (1 calls)
96ms - infer
2ms - trait_solve_query (2 calls)
94ms - ???
0ms - body_with_source_map_query (1 calls)
0ms - crate_def_map (1 calls)
[...]
```
Signed-off-by: Michal Terepeta <[email protected]>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change:
- introduces `compute_crate_def_map` query and renames
`CrateDefMap::crate_def_map_query` for consistency,
- annotates `crate_def_map` as `salsa::transparent` and adds a
top-level `crate_def_map` wrapper function around that starts the
profiler and immediately calls into `compute_crate_def_map` query.
This allows us to better understand where we spent the time, in
particular, how much is spent in the recomputaiton and how much in
salsa.
Example output (where we don't actually re-compute anything, but the
query still takes a non-trivial amount of time):
```
211ms - handle_inlay_hints
150ms - get_inlay_hints
150ms - SourceAnalyzer::new
65ms - def_with_body_from_child_node
65ms - analyze_container
65ms - analyze_container
65ms - Module::from_definition
65ms - Module::from_file
65ms - crate_def_map
1ms - parse_macro_query (6 calls)
0ms - raw_items_query (1 calls)
64ms - ???
```
Signed-off-by: Michal Terepeta <[email protected]>
|