| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjusting `grammar::fragments::stmt` to Optional or Yes will break
original functionality and tests.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
7010: Update ungrammar for const block patterns r=matklad a=Veykril
Fixes #6848
Adds const blocks and const block patterns to the AST and parses them.
Blocked on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/17/, will merge that PR there once this one gets the OK so I can remove the local ungrammar dependency path and fix the Cargo.lock.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6934: Implement `cfg_attr` handling r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5548
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6896: Node-ify lifetimes r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Let's see if this passes the tests 🤞
Depends on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/15
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6897: Basic support for macros 2.0 r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This adds support for (built-in-only) macros 2.0, and removes some hacks used for builtin derives, which are declared via macros 2.0 in libcore.
First steps for https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/2248.
Blocked on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/16.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6894: Parenthesize composite if condition before inverting in invert-if assist r=matklad a=Jesse-Bakker
Fixes #6867
Co-authored-by: Jesse Bakker <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switching from SyntaxNode to GreenNode is a costly operation (b/c
dereferencing a synax ptr in `with_green` is linear), so we should
avoid that.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6719: Use items can also have doc comments r=matklad a=Veykril
Prior to this change modules show more docs than they have cause they inherit the docs from documented use items inside of them.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6649: Accept more than just the standard rust literal suffixes in *Number::suffix r=matklad a=Veykril
I am not entirely sure whether to keep or remove the `SUFFIXES` but I figured we can always bring them back once they are needed.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6558: format string highlighting: handle hex + debug type specifier r=matklad a=ruabmbua
Should fix https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6427
Co-authored-by: Roland Ruckerbauer <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6512: Don't replace parent node when inserting as first child in algo::diff r=SomeoneToIgnore a=Veykril
This makes the diff a bit more detailed.
See https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/6287#issuecomment-723889267 for context
cc @SomeoneToIgnore
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6476: Add missing AssocItems in add_custom_impl assist r=matklad a=Veykril
```rust
use std::fmt;
#[derive(Debu<|>g)]
struct Foo {
bar: String,
}
```
->
```rust
use std::fmt;
struct Foo {
bar: String,
}
impl fmt::Debug for Foo {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
${0:todo!()}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Syntactically, they are indistinguishable from non-raw versions, so it
doesn't make sense to separate then *at the syntax* level.
|
| | |
|