| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switching from SyntaxNode to GreenNode is a costly operation (b/c
dereferencing a synax ptr in `with_green` is linear), so we should
avoid that.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6719: Use items can also have doc comments r=matklad a=Veykril
Prior to this change modules show more docs than they have cause they inherit the docs from documented use items inside of them.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6649: Accept more than just the standard rust literal suffixes in *Number::suffix r=matklad a=Veykril
I am not entirely sure whether to keep or remove the `SUFFIXES` but I figured we can always bring them back once they are needed.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6558: format string highlighting: handle hex + debug type specifier r=matklad a=ruabmbua
Should fix https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6427
Co-authored-by: Roland Ruckerbauer <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6512: Don't replace parent node when inserting as first child in algo::diff r=SomeoneToIgnore a=Veykril
This makes the diff a bit more detailed.
See https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/6287#issuecomment-723889267 for context
cc @SomeoneToIgnore
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6476: Add missing AssocItems in add_custom_impl assist r=matklad a=Veykril
```rust
use std::fmt;
#[derive(Debu<|>g)]
struct Foo {
bar: String,
}
```
->
```rust
use std::fmt;
struct Foo {
bar: String,
}
impl fmt::Debug for Foo {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
${0:todo!()}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Syntactically, they are indistinguishable from non-raw versions, so it
doesn't make sense to separate then *at the syntax* level.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6456: Support record variants in extract_struct_from_enum_variant r=matklad a=Veykril
As requested :)
This also prevents the assist from being disabled if a definition in the value namespace exists with the same name as our new struct since that won't cause a collision
#4468
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6454: Fix overflow panic in convert_interger_literal assist r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This also seizes the opportunity to move integer literal parsing to
the syntax crate, were it logically belongs.
Note though that this is still done in an ad hoc manner -- we probably
should split kitchen sink ast::Literal into a separate APIs for
strings, ints, etc
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6365: Do insertion lookahead in algo::diff r=matklad a=Veykril
This is the last blocker for #6287 after this I can update that PR to properly fix things through using `SyntaxRewriter`.
This PR also shuffles tests around a bit and adds some more.
Ideally this is just a hack until we implement a "proper" diff algorithm that approximates a minimal diff. Maybe something like [gumtree](https://github.com/GumTreeDiff/gumtree)?
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It's very useful when `pub` is equivalent to "this is crate's public
API", let's enforce this!
Ideally, we should enforce it for local `cargo test`, and only during
CI, but that needs https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/5034.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6333: Don't interpret type path as part of visibility. r=matklad a=ArifRoktim
This closes #5902.
I only check that the next token isn't equal to `T![:]`, instead of the next two not being equal to `T![::]`. Is that ok?
Co-authored-by: Arif Roktim <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6347: Support insertion in SyntaxRewriter r=Veykril a=Veykril
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|