| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
8546: Return CallInfo for unclosed call expressions r=Veykril a=Veykril
Closes #8522
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | | |_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
8542: Include path in `unresolved-macro-call` diagnostic r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | |/ / / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
8539: fix: Do not propose inherent traits in flyimports and import assists r=flodiebold a=SomeoneToIgnore
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8520
I've went with a separate method approach, since the [highlighted code](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8520#issuecomment-819856337) has not`Type` and uses `Ty` to get his data, but the code I had to change has no access to `Ty` and has `Type` only.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <[email protected]>
|
| | |/ / / / / / |
|
| | |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
8543: Assist fix: Fill match arms for a tuple of a single enum. r=Veykril a=iDawer
This is rather a small fix addressing an issue mentioned in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8493#issuecomment-818770670
Co-authored-by: Dawer <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | \ \ \ \ \ | |
| |\ \| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
8510: Move cursor position when using item movers r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This updates the cursor position when moving items around to stay in the same location within the moved node.
I changed the `moveItem` response to `SnippetTextEdit[]`, since that made more sense to me (the file was ignored by the client anyways, since the edits always apply to the current document). It also matches `onEnter`, which seems logical to me, but please let me know if this doesn't make sense.
There's still a bug in the client-side snippet code that will cause the cursor position to be slightly off when moving parameters in the same line (presumably we don't track the column correctly after deleting `$0`). Not really sure how to fix that immediately, but this PR should already be an improvement despite that bug.
8533: Fix typo in style guide r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes bold text rendering
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | |_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | |
|
| | |/ / / /
|/| | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
8354: Distinguishing between different operators in semantic highlighting r=matklad a=chetankhilosiya
Co-authored-by: Chetan Khilosiya <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Operator semantic highlighting.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
8415: Fix faulty assertion when extracting function with macro call r=matklad a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
```rust
fn main() {
let n = 1;
let k = n * n;
dbg!(n);
}
```
1. Select the second and third lines of the main function. Use the "Extract into function" code assist.
2. Panic occurs in debug, error is logged in release: "[ERROR ide_assists::handlers::extract_function] assertion failed: matches!(path, ast :: Expr :: PathExpr(_))".
3. Function generates successfully on release where the panic was bypassed.
```rust
fn fun_name(n: i32) {
let k = n * n;
dbg!(n);
}
```
**Cause:**
- The generated function will take `n` as a parameter. The extraction logic needs to search the usages of `n` to determine whether it is used mutably or not. The helper `path_element_of_reference` is called for each usage but the second usage is a macro call and fails the `Expr::PathExpr(_)` match assertion.
- The caller of `path_element_of_reference` does implicitly assume it to be a `Expr::PathExpr(_)` in how it looks at its parent node for determining whether it is used mutably. This logic will not work for macros.
- I'm not sure if there are any other cases besides macros where it could be something other than a `Expr::PathExpr(_)`. I tried various examples and could not find any.
**Fix:**
- Update assertion to include the macro case.
- Add a FIXME to properly handle checking if a macro usage requires mutable access. For now, return false instead of running the existing logic that is tailored for `Expr::PathExpr(_)`'s.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
8489: Indent block expressions on enter r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This improves on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8388 by also indenting the created block expression on enter.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
8500: internal: fix flakiness of accidentally quadratic test r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / / / / |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
8494: internal: unfork code paths for unresolved and resolved assist r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / / / |
|
| |/ / / / / /
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
:see_no_evil:
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Conceptually, using a *message* here is wrong, because this is a
"status", rather than "point in time" thing. But statuses are an LSP
extension, while messages are stable. As a compromise, send message only
for more critical `metadata` failures, and only once per state change.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|_|/
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This condition should always be true for *valid* code, but of course
there might be invalid code or things that we can't currently resolve.
Fixes #8464.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
8465: Include more info in assert r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This helped find https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8464
changelog skip
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | | |
|
