| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8543: Assist fix: Fill match arms for a tuple of a single enum. r=Veykril a=iDawer
This is rather a small fix addressing an issue mentioned in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8493#issuecomment-818770670
Co-authored-by: Dawer <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | | |
| \ | |
|\ \|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8510: Move cursor position when using item movers r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This updates the cursor position when moving items around to stay in the same location within the moved node.
I changed the `moveItem` response to `SnippetTextEdit[]`, since that made more sense to me (the file was ignored by the client anyways, since the edits always apply to the current document). It also matches `onEnter`, which seems logical to me, but please let me know if this doesn't make sense.
There's still a bug in the client-side snippet code that will cause the cursor position to be slightly off when moving parameters in the same line (presumably we don't track the column correctly after deleting `$0`). Not really sure how to fix that immediately, but this PR should already be an improvement despite that bug.
8533: Fix typo in style guide r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes bold text rendering
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|/| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8354: Distinguishing between different operators in semantic highlighting r=matklad a=chetankhilosiya
Co-authored-by: Chetan Khilosiya <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Operator semantic highlighting.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
8415: Fix faulty assertion when extracting function with macro call r=matklad a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
```rust
fn main() {
let n = 1;
let k = n * n;
dbg!(n);
}
```
1. Select the second and third lines of the main function. Use the "Extract into function" code assist.
2. Panic occurs in debug, error is logged in release: "[ERROR ide_assists::handlers::extract_function] assertion failed: matches!(path, ast :: Expr :: PathExpr(_))".
3. Function generates successfully on release where the panic was bypassed.
```rust
fn fun_name(n: i32) {
let k = n * n;
dbg!(n);
}
```
**Cause:**
- The generated function will take `n` as a parameter. The extraction logic needs to search the usages of `n` to determine whether it is used mutably or not. The helper `path_element_of_reference` is called for each usage but the second usage is a macro call and fails the `Expr::PathExpr(_)` match assertion.
- The caller of `path_element_of_reference` does implicitly assume it to be a `Expr::PathExpr(_)` in how it looks at its parent node for determining whether it is used mutably. This logic will not work for macros.
- I'm not sure if there are any other cases besides macros where it could be something other than a `Expr::PathExpr(_)`. I tried various examples and could not find any.
**Fix:**
- Update assertion to include the macro case.
- Add a FIXME to properly handle checking if a macro usage requires mutable access. For now, return false instead of running the existing logic that is tailored for `Expr::PathExpr(_)`'s.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <[email protected]>
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
8489: Indent block expressions on enter r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This improves on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8388 by also indenting the created block expression on enter.
![on enter](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1786438/114444123-cb38d600-9bce-11eb-8af2-8e8d1c0f9908.gif)
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
8500: internal: fix flakiness of accidentally quadratic test r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
8494: internal: unfork code paths for unresolved and resolved assist r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / |
|
|/ / / /
| | | |
| | | | |
:see_no_evil:
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conceptually, using a *message* here is wrong, because this is a
"status", rather than "point in time" thing. But statuses are an LSP
extension, while messages are stable. As a compromise, send message only
for more critical `metadata` failures, and only once per state change.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This condition should always be true for *valid* code, but of course
there might be invalid code or things that we can't currently resolve.
Fixes #8464.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
8465: Include more info in assert r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This helped find https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8464
changelog skip
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
8463: Support macros in pattern position r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This was fairly easy, because patterns are limited to bodies, so almost all changes were inside body lowering.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| |/ / / / |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
8436: Fix extract function's mutability of variables outliving the body r=matklad a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
```rust
fn main() {
let mut k = 1;
let mut j = 2;
j += 1;
k += j;
}
```
1. Select the first to third lines of the main function. Use the "Extract into function" code assist.
2. The output is the following which does not compile because the outlived variable `k` is declared as immutable:
```rust
fn main() {
let (k, j) = fun_name();
k += j;
}
fn fun_name() -> (i32, i32) {
let mut k = 1;
let mut j = 2;
j += 1;
(k, j)
}
```
3. We would instead expect the output to be:
```rust
fn main() {
let (mut k, j) = fun_name();
k += j;
}
```
**Fix:**
- Instead of declaring outlived variables as immutable unconditionally, check for any mutable usages outside of the extracted function.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <[email protected]>
|