aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* | | Fix applicability of inline localAleksey Kladov2020-03-033-10/+34
|/ /
* / Remove stray dbgAleksey Kladov2020-03-031-2/+2
|/
* Drop larlpop-intern depLaurențiu Nicola2020-03-032-4/+2
|
* Update chalk for Ty internersLaurențiu Nicola2020-03-022-11/+14
|
* Update chalk for RawId removalLaurențiu Nicola2020-03-022-16/+10
|
* Simplify by using to_veckjeremy2020-03-021-2/+2
|
* Merge #3406bors[bot]2020-03-022-23/+13
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3406: Simplify: remove couple of useless functions r=matklad a=matklad bors r+ 🤖 Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * Simplify: remove couple of useless functionsAleksey Kladov2020-03-022-23/+13
| |
* | Merge #3405bors[bot]2020-03-027-36/+79
|\| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3405: More principled approach for gotodef for field shorhand r=matklad a=matklad Callers can now decide for themselves if they should prefer field or local definition. By default, it's the local. bors r+ 🤖 Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * More principled approach for gotodef for field shorhandAleksey Kladov2020-03-027-36/+79
| | | | | | | | | | Callers can now decide for themselves if they should prefer field or local definition. By default, it's the local.
* | lsp-types 0.72kjeremy2020-03-024-14/+11
|/
*-. Merge #3397 #3398bors[bot]2020-03-022-11/+3
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3397: Minimal viable meta r=matklad a=matklad bors r+ 🤖 3398: Reformat? r=matklad a=matklad bors r+ 🤖 Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| | * Reformat?Aleksey Kladov2020-03-022-11/+3
| |/
* | Merge #3385bors[bot]2020-03-024-6/+45
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3385: Fix #3373 r=matklad a=flodiebold Basically, we need to allow variables in the caller self type to unify with the impl's declared self type. That requires some more contortions in the variable handling. I'm looking forward to (hopefully) handling this in a cleaner way when we switch to Chalk's types and unification code. Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>
| * Fix #3373Florian Diebold2020-03-014-6/+45
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basically, we need to allow variables in the caller self type to unify with the impl's declared self type. That requires some more contortions in the variable handling. I'm looking forward to (hopefully) handling this in a cleaner way when we switch to Chalk's types and unification code.
* | One more assertAleksey Kladov2020-03-021-1/+6
| |
* | Tighten up an assertAleksey Kladov2020-03-021-0/+4
| |
* | Merge #3387bors[bot]2020-03-012-2/+108
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3387: Type inference for slice patterns r=flodiebold a=JoshMcguigan Fixes #3043 Notes to reviewer: 1. This only works if `expected` is `Ty::Apply`. I'm not sure of the implications of this. 1. This only works if the slice pattern only has a prefix. I think this means it doesn't work for subslice patterns, which are currently only available behind a feature flag. Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <[email protected]>
| * | handle array pattern matching type inferenceJosh Mcguigan2020-03-012-10/+55
| | |
| * | remove match statement, handle suffixJosh Mcguigan2020-03-012-14/+11
| | |
| * | handle arbitrary length slicesJosh Mcguigan2020-03-012-12/+29
| | |
| * | match single prefix sliceJosh Mcguigan2020-03-012-1/+48
| |/
* | Merge #3384bors[bot]2020-03-014-6/+88
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3384: fix #2377 super::super::* r=flodiebold a=JoshMcguigan Thanks @matklad for the detailed explanation on #2377. I believe this fixes it. One thing I'm not sure about is you said the fix would involve changing `crates/ra_hir_def/src/path/lower/lower.rs`, but I only changed `crates/ra_hir_def/src/path/lower/lower_use.rs`. I'm not sure what kind of test code I'd have to write to expose the issue in `lower.rs`, but I'd be happy to add it if you are able to provide additional guidance. closes #2377 Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <[email protected]>
| * fix completion for super::super::Josh Mcguigan2020-03-012-2/+45
| |
| * fix #2377 super::super::*Josh Mcguigan2020-03-012-4/+43
| |
* | Merge #3383bors[bot]2020-02-292-70/+59
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3383: Slightly refactor inlay hints r=matklad a=matklad bors r+ 🤖 Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * | Slightly refactor inlay hintsAleksey Kladov2020-02-292-70/+59
| | |
* | | Merge #3382bors[bot]2020-02-291-1/+1
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3382: ra_project_model: migrate to Sysroot::alloc() r=matklad a=Veetaha Co-authored-by: Veetaha <[email protected]>
| * | | ra_project_model: migrate to Sysroot::alloc()Veetaha2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | |
* | | | Merge #3381bors[bot]2020-02-291-1/+0
|\ \ \ \ | | |/ / | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3381: Remove debug print r=matklad a=matklad bors r+ 🤖 Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
| * | | Remove debug printAleksey Kladov2020-02-291-1/+0
| |/ /
* | | Do autoderef for indexingFlorian Diebold2020-02-294-7/+74
| | |
* | | Do array unsizing for method receiversFlorian Diebold2020-02-292-2/+37
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | It turns out rustc actually only unsizes array method receivers, so we don't need to do any trait solving for this (at least for now). Fixes #2670.
* | Rename ast::ImplBlock -> ast::ImplDefAleksey Kladov2020-02-2967-221/+213
| |
* | Add a FIXMEAleksey Kladov2020-02-291-0/+2
|/
* Handle tuple fields as wellAleksey Kladov2020-02-292-1/+7
|
* MinorAleksey Kladov2020-02-292-5/+4
|
* Simplify SourceBinderAleksey Kladov2020-02-296-349/+321
|
* Small cleanupAleksey Kladov2020-02-291-9/+15
|
* Merge #3309bors[bot]2020-02-292-10/+70
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3309: Find cargo toml up the fs r=matklad a=not-much-io Currently rust-analyzer will look for Cargo.toml in the root of the project and if failing that then go down the filesystem until root. This unfortunately wouldn't work automatically with (what I imagine is) a fairly common project structure. As an example with multiple languages like: ``` js/ .. rust/ Cargo.toml ... ``` Added this small change so rust-analyzer would glance one level up if not found in root or down the filesystem. ## Why not go deeper? Could be problematic with large project vendored dependencies etc. ## Why not add a Cargo.toml manual setting option? Loosely related and a good idea, however the convenience of having this automated also is hard to pass up. ## Testing? Build a binary with various logs and checked it in a project with such a structure: ``` [ERROR ra_project_model] find_cargo_toml() [ERROR ra_project_model] find_cargo_toml_up_the_fs() [ERROR ra_project_model] entities: ReadDir("/workspaces/my-project") [ERROR ra_project_model] candidate: "/workspaces/my-project/rust/Cargo.toml", exists: true ``` ## Edge Cases? If you have multiple Cargo.toml files one level deeper AND not in the root, will get whatever comes first (order undefined), example: ``` crate1/ Cargo.toml crate2/ Cargo.toml ... (no root Cargo.toml) ``` However this is quite unusual and wouldn't have worked before either. This is only resolvable via manually choosing. Co-authored-by: nmio <[email protected]>
| * lint warn fixnmio2020-02-291-4/+2
| |
| * keep one CargoTomlNotFoundErrornmio2020-02-292-29/+37
| |
| * remove code used for testingnmio2020-02-271-1/+1
| |
| * fix unneeded bodynmio2020-02-271-6/+2
| |
| * fixes and improvementsnmio2020-02-272-24/+50
| |
| * clean upnmio2020-02-251-7/+2
| |
| * Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer into ↵nmio2020-02-2519-146/+402
| |\ | | | | | | | | | find-cargo-toml-up-the-fs
| * | Initial debugging codenmio2020-02-241-5/+42
| | |
* | | Fix a common false-positive type mismatchFlorian Diebold2020-02-294-18/+86
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | E.g. for `&{ some_string() }` in a context where a `&str` is expected, we reported a mismatch inside the block. The problem is that we're passing an expectation of `str` down, but the expectation is more of a hint in this case. There's a long comment in rustc about this, which I just copied. Also, fix reported location for type mismatches in macros.
* | | Fix typoAleksey Kladov2020-02-293-3/+3
| | |
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-05 08:33:41 +0000