| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
1663: architecture.md: update path to parser tests r=matklad a=eupn
Co-authored-by: eupn <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/
|
| |
Is this a typo?
|
|
|
|
| |
closes #1615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new commands are
$ cargo install-ra --client-code
$ cargo install-ra --server --jemalloc
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This appears to have been introduced ages ago in
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/commit/be742a587704f27f4e503c50f549aa9ec1527fcc
but has since been removed.
As it stands, it is problematic if multiple instances of the
rust-analyzer LSP are launched during the same VS Code session because
VS Code complains about multiple LSP servers trying to register the
same command.
Most LSP servers workaround this by parameterizing the command by the
process id. For example, this is where `rls` does this:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/blob/ff0b9057c8f62bc4f8113d741e96c9587ef1a817/rls/src/server/mod.rs#L413-L421
Though `apply_code_action` does not seems to be used, so it seems better
to delete it than to parameterize it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Can be used like this:
```
$ cargo run --release -p ra_cli -- \
analysis-bench ../chalk/ \
--complete ../chalk/chalk-engine/src/logic.rs:94:0
loading: 225.970093ms
from scratch: 8.492373325s
no change: 445.265µs
trivial change: 95.631242ms
```
Or like this:
```
$ cargo run --release -p ra_cli -- \
analysis-bench ../chalk/ \
--highlight ../chalk/chalk-engine/src/logic.rs
loading: 209.873484ms
from scratch: 9.504916942s
no change: 7.731119ms
trivial change: 124.984039ms
```
"from scratch" includes initial analysis of the relevant bits of the
project
"no change" just asks the same question for the second time. It
measures overhead on assembling the answer outside of salsa.
"trivial change" doesn't do an actual salsa change, it just advances
the revision. This test how fast is salsa at validating things.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ra_ide_api_light removed completely
|
|
|
|
| |
If you want to **use** ra, you don't need api docs
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|