| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8795: Allow semantic tokens for strings to be disabled r=matklad a=djrenren
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7111
Pretty straightforward change, but open to any suggestions if there's a more recommended testing strategy than what I went with.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We add `// see the other repo` comments before headers (==). This one isn't a header, but a closing of the example block.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using `Option` arguments such that you always pass `None` or `Some` at
the call site is a code smell.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
8482: Mention how to customize unsafe operation styles r=matklad a=danielzfranklin
I was confused about how to do this, so I filed #8474. I apologize for initially filing this incorrectly and spamming people.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Franklin <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I was confused about how to do this, so I filed [an issue][issue].
[issue]: rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer#8474
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84647 would help big time here.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8605: internal: Automatically categorize the changelog entries r=matklad a=lnicola
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
8621: feat: make sure nightly regressions don't break users r=lnicola a=matklad
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8598: minor: fix ugly line wrapping in the rendered manual r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8588: internal: Add guidelines for release notes PR descriptions r=matklad a=lnicola
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
| |
| |
| | |
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <[email protected]>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* don't feel obliged to quickly review every PR assigned to you
* so that other folks can notify you about interesting PRs without
thinking to much about creating additional work for you
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | | |
| \ | |
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
8510: Move cursor position when using item movers r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This updates the cursor position when moving items around to stay in the same location within the moved node.
I changed the `moveItem` response to `SnippetTextEdit[]`, since that made more sense to me (the file was ignored by the client anyways, since the edits always apply to the current document). It also matches `onEnter`, which seems logical to me, but please let me know if this doesn't make sense.
There's still a bug in the client-side snippet code that will cause the cursor position to be slightly off when moving parameters in the same line (presumably we don't track the column correctly after deleting `$0`). Not really sure how to fix that immediately, but this PR should already be an improvement despite that bug.
8533: Fix typo in style guide r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes bold text rendering
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|
| |/ /
|/| | |
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix #8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|/| |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|