| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6137: add a new TextMate grammar r=matklad a=dustypomerleau
Thanks to everyone working hard on Rust Analyzer - my impression is that it's quickly becoming the community default.
I think it would be helpful to have a more robust TextMate grammar to fall back on, for those who wish to disable semantic highlighting for any reason. It should allow theming of punctuation, and provide scopes for all tokens on the page. This can be done at zero cost to those who enable semantic highlighting, as the TextMate scopes will be invisible to those users.
I can see a couple ways of accomplishing this:
1. Ship a new grammar by merging this PR.
1. Ship no TextMate grammar at all (like the [Rust](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=rust-lang.rust) extension), and allow users to install a separate extension that provides the grammar of their choice (I have released this one as [Rust Syntax](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=dustypomerleau.rust-syntax)). If no grammar were installed, they would simply fall back to the default grammar provided by their editor. In the case of VS Code, the default grammar already matches what is currently being shipped, so users who choose not to override it would see no difference.
I have tried to choose sensible default scopes, in the hopes that a wider variety of themes would work out of the box with Rust, even if those themes do not yet supply scopes for semantic highlighting. There is definitely some interest in using this grammar with Rust Analyzer, as this was the very first issue after the syntax extension was shipped: https://github.com/dustypomerleau/rust-syntax/issues/1.
I considered simply using an alternative grammar alongside Rust Analyzer, but this doesn't seem possible. When RA starts, any existing grammar/extension is overridden, and I haven't been able to find a workaround.
Co-authored-by: Dusty Pomerleau <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Currently a method only has defaultness if it is a provided trait
method, but this will change when specialisation is available and may
need to become a concept known to hir.
I opted to go for a 'fewest changes' approach given specialisation is
still under development.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
* Chalk very recently (like an hour ago) merged a fix that prevents rust analyzer from panicking. This allows it to be usable again for code that hits those situations. See #6134, #6145, Probably #6120
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This should help with troubleshooting wrong project configuration
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since this is required by all callsites its easier to have it in the
function itself.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous version would have interpreted an empty token as
an abort of the dialog and would have not properly cleared the token.
This is now fixed by checking for `undefined` for a an abort and
by setting the token to `undefined` in order to clear it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the change already implements a retry dialog for
network operations, let's also use it for allowing to retry the
actual file.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change allows to use a authorization token provided by Github in
order to fetch metadata for a RA release. Using an authorization token
prevents to get rate-limited in environments where lots of RA users use
a shared client IP (e.g. behind a company NAT).
The auth token is stored in `ExtensionContext.globalState`.
As far as I could observe through testing with a local WSL2 environment
that state is synced between an extension installed locally and a remote
version.
The change provides no explicit command to query for an auth token.
However in case a download fails it will provide a retry option as well
as an option to enter the auth token. This should be more discoverable
for most users.
Closes #3688
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
5985: Make MergeBehaviour configurable r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
This should make the newly implemented `MergeBehaviour` for import insertion configurable as roughly outlined in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/5935#issuecomment-685834257. For the config name and the like I just picked what came to mind so that might be up for bikeshedding.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bumps [node-fetch](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch) from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/blob/master/docs/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch/compare/v2.6.0...v2.6.1)
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Stabilizes call hierarchy and semantic tokens features.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
5910: Fix some typos r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
5912: Remove fixme from inlay_hints.ts r=matklad a=Veetaha
I have reevaluated the fixme and it doesn't seem necessary to pass an array of files
to the inlay hints request.
This will (a) make the request more compilcated (b), make us wait for
inlay hints for `all` active editors resolve at once before rendering and (c)
doesn't seem required because 99% of the time there is a single active editor
in the IDE
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I have reevaluated the fixme and it doesn't seem necessary to pass an array of files
to the inlay hints request.
This will (a) make the request more compilcated (b), make us wait for
inlay hints for `all` active editors resolve at once before rendering and (c)
doesn't seem required because 99% of the time there is a single active editor
in the IDE
|
| |/ |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
5841: Gate stream.pipeline workaround on fixed versions of node r=matklad a=Veetaha
Fixes the symptom of https://github.com/cdr/code-server/issues/1810
Original report here: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3167#issuecomment-678390564
Thanks to @hjfreyer for precise investigation :D
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
5682: Add an option to disable diagnostics r=matklad a=popzxc
As far as I know, currently it's not possible to disable a selected type of diagnostics provided by `rust-analyzer`.
This causes an inconvenient situation with a false-positive warnings: you either have to disable all the diagnostics, or you have to ignore these warnings.
There are some open issues related to this problem, e.g.: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5412, https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5502
This PR attempts to make it possible to selectively disable some diagnostics on per-project basis.
Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <[email protected]>
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \ |
|