aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/xtask/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Specify literal tokensAleksey Kladov2020-07-312-1/+8
|
* MinorAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-7/+6
|
* Rename LambdaExpr -> ClosureExprAleksey Kladov2020-07-313-10/+22
|
* Work on expressions grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-312-157/+176
|
* Item is a StmtAleksey Kladov2020-07-312-1/+4
|
* Handwrite StmtAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-25/+26
|
* Move Stmt GrammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-11/+11
|
* Finalize WhereClause gramamrAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-7/+7
|
* Finalize TypeBound grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-6/+7
|
* "Finalize" Types grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-1/+1
| | | | | | | Note that `for` type is rust-analyzer's own invention. Both the reference and syn allow `for` only for fnptr types, and we allow them everywhere. This needs to be checked with respect to type bounds grammar...
* Reame PlaceholderType -> InferTypeAleksey Kladov2020-07-312-9/+9
|
* Rename TypeRef -> TypeAleksey Kladov2020-07-312-28/+34
| | | | | | | | | | The TypeRef name comes from IntelliJ days, where you often have both type *syntax* as well as *semantical* representation of types in scope. And naming both Type is confusing. In rust-analyzer however, we use ast types as `ast::Type`, and have many more semantic counterparts to ast types, so avoiding name clash here is just confusing.
* ReorderAleksey Kladov2020-07-311-20/+20
|
* Use ty to access most TypeRefsAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-10/+10
|
* Remove TypeAscriptionOwnerAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-9/+8
|
* simplifyAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-3/+2
|
* Finalize attribute grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-4/+1
|
* Dead codeAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-3/+0
|
* MinorAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-7/+6
|
* Finalize visibility grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-3/+8
|
* Introduce GenericParamAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-18/+20
|
* Finaize item grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-16/+16
|
* Finalize impl GrammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-5/+8
|
* Finalize Trait grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-3/+3
|
* Fix param gramamrAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-2/+5
|
* Finalize const&static grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-14/+14
|
* Finalize Enum grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-1/+1
|
* Rename EnumVariant -> VariantAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-6/+6
|
* Rename EnumDef -> EnumAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-8/+8
|
* Rename StructDef -> StructAleksey Kladov2020-07-303-5/+5
|
* Finalize union grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-4/+4
|
* Finalize structs grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-4/+3
|
* SimplifyAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-36/+26
|
* Simplify codegenAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-26/+25
|
* Rename FieldDef -> FieldAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-17/+17
|
* Rename RecordLit -> RecordExprAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-9/+9
|
* Minor, reorderAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-4/+5
|
* Rename TypeParamList -> GenericParamListAleksey Kladov2020-07-303-12/+12
|
* Rename TypeAliasDef -> TypeAliasAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-7/+7
|
* Rename FnDef -> FnAleksey Kladov2020-07-303-25/+30
|
* Rename UseItem -> UseAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-3/+3
|
* Add comma list to use treeAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-12/+48
|
* Finish extern crates grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-5/+5
|
* Rename RenameAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-4/+4
|
* Finish Module grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-301-1/+1
|
* Split ItemList & AssocItemListAleksey Kladov2020-07-302-11/+13
|
* Finish SourceFile grammarAleksey Kladov2020-07-292-1/+2
|
* Rename ModuleItem -> ItemAleksey Kladov2020-07-291-20/+20
|
* Rename NomialDef -> AdtDefAleksey Kladov2020-07-291-1/+1
|
* Switch to ungrammar from ast_srcAleksey Kladov2020-07-293-1983/+754
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The primary advantage of ungrammar is that it (eventually) allows one to describe concrete syntax tree structure -- with alternatives and specific sequence of tokens & nodes. That should be re-usable for: * generate `make` calls * Rust reference * Hypothetical parser's evented API We loose doc comments for the time being unfortunately. I don't think we should add support for doc comments to ungrammar -- they'll make grammar file hard to read. We might supply docs as out-of band info, or maybe just via a reference, but we'll think about that once things are no longer in flux