1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
use crate::{make, Metadata, Report, Rule, Suggestion};
use if_chain::if_chain;
use macros::lint;
use rnix::{
types::{Ident, KeyValue, TokenWrapper, TypedNode},
NodeOrToken, SyntaxElement, SyntaxKind,
};
/// ## What it does
/// Checks for bindings of the form `a = a`.
///
/// ## Why is this bad?
/// If the aim is to bring attributes from a larger scope into
/// the current scope, prefer an inherit statement.
///
/// ## Example
///
/// ```nix
/// let
/// a = 2;
/// in
/// { a = a; b = 3; }
/// ```
///
/// Try `inherit` instead:
///
/// ```nix
/// let
/// a = 2;
/// in
/// { inherit a; b = 3; }
/// ```
#[lint(
name = "manual_inherit",
note = "Assignment instead of inherit",
code = 3,
match_with = SyntaxKind::NODE_KEY_VALUE
)]
struct ManualInherit;
impl Rule for ManualInherit {
fn validate(&self, node: &SyntaxElement) -> Option<Report> {
if_chain! {
if let NodeOrToken::Node(node) = node;
if let Some(key_value_stmt) = KeyValue::cast(node.clone());
if let mut key_path = key_value_stmt.key()?.path();
if let Some(key_node) = key_path.next();
// ensure that path has exactly one component
if key_path.next().is_none();
if let Some(key) = Ident::cast(key_node);
if let Some(value_node) = key_value_stmt.value();
if let Some(value) = Ident::cast(value_node);
if key.as_str() == value.as_str();
then {
let at = node.text_range();
let replacement = make::inherit_stmt(&[key]).node().clone();
let message = "This assignment is better written with `inherit`";
Some(self.report().suggest(at, message, Suggestion::new(at, replacement)))
} else {
None
}
}
}
}
|
