Auto-currying Rust Functions
This post contains a gentle introduction to procedural macros in Rust and a guide to writing a procedural macro to curry Rust functions. The source code for the entire library can be found here. It is also available on crates.io.
The following links might prove to be useful before getting started:
Or you can pretend you read them, because I have included a primer here :)
Contents
- Currying
- Procedural Macros
- Definitions
- Refinement
- The In-betweens
5.1 Dependencies
5.2 The attribute macro
5.3 Function Body
5.4 Function Signature
5.5 Getting it together
- Debugging and Testing
- Notes
- Conclusion
Currying
Currying is the process of transformation of a function call like
f(a, b, c)
to f(a)(b)(c)
. A curried function
returns a concrete value only when it receives all its arguments! If it
does recieve an insufficient amount of arguments, say 1 of 3, it returns
a curried function, that returns after receiving 2
arguments.
curry(f(a, b, c)) = h(a)(b)(c)
h(x) = g <- curried function that takes upto 2 args (g)
g(y) = k <- curried function that takes upto 1 arg (k)
k(z) = v <- a value (v)
Keen readers will conclude the following,
h(x)(y)(z) = g(y)(z) = k(z) = v
Mathematically, if f
is a function that takes two
arguments x
and y
, such that
x ϵ X
, and y ϵ Y
, we write it as:
f: (X × Y) -> Z
where ×
denotes the Cartesian product of set
X
and Y
, and curried f
(denoted
by h
here) is written as:
h: X -> (Y -> Z)
Procedural Macros
These are functions that take code as input and spit out modified code as output. Powerful stuff. Rust has three kinds of proc-macros:
- Function like macros
- Derive macros:
#[derive(...)]
, used to automatically implement traits for structs/enums
- and Attribute macros:
#[test]
, usually slapped onto functions
We will be using Attribute macros to convert a Rust function into a
curried Rust function, which we should be able to call via:
function(arg1)(arg2)
.
Definitions
Being respectable programmers, we define the input to and the output from our proc-macro. Here’s a good non-trivial function to start out with:
fn add(x: u32, y: u32, z: u32) -> u32 {
return x + y + z;
}
Hmm, what would our output look like? What should our proc-macro generate ideally? Well, if we understood currying correctly, we should accept an argument and return a function that accepts an argument and returns … you get the point. Something like this should do:
fn add_curried1(x: u32) -> ? {
return fn add_curried2 (y: u32) -> ? {
return fn add_curried3 (z: u32) -> u32 {
return x + y + z;
}
}
}
A couple of things to note:
Return types
We have placed ?
s in place of return types. Let’s try to
fix that. add_curried3
returns the ‘value’, so
u32
is accurate. add_curried2
returns
add_curried3
. What is the type of
add_curried3
? It is a function that takes in a
u32
and returns a u32
. So a
fn(u32) -> u32
will do right? No, I’ll explain why in
the next point, but for now, we will make use of the Fn
trait, our return type is impl Fn(u32) -> u32
. This
basically tells the compiler that we will be returning something
function-like, a.k.a, behaves like a Fn
. Cool!
If you have been following along, you should be able to tell that the
return type of add_curried1
is:
impl Fn(u32) -> (impl Fn(u32) -> u32)
We can drop the parentheses because ->
is right
associative:
impl Fn(u32) -> impl Fn(u32) -> u32
Accessing environment
A function cannot access it’s environment. Our solution will not work.
add_curried3
attempts to access x
, which is
not allowed! A closure1 however, can. If we are returning a
closure, our return type must be impl Fn
, and not
fn
. The difference between the Fn
trait and
function pointers is beyond the scope of this post.
Refinement
Armed with knowledge, we refine our expected output, this time, employing closures:
fn add(x: u32) -> impl Fn(u32) -> impl Fn(u32) -> u32 {
return move |y| move |z| x + y + z;
}
Alas, that does not compile either! It errors out with the following message:
error[E0562]: `impl Trait` not allowed outside of function
and inherent method return types
--> src/main.rs:17:37
|
| fn add(x: u32) -> impl Fn(u32) -> impl Fn(u32) -> u32
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are allowed to return an impl Fn
only inside a
function. We are currently returning it from another return! Or at
least, that was the most I could make out of the error message.
We are going to have to cheat a bit to fix this issue; with type aliases and a convenient nightly feature 2:
#![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)] // allows us to use `impl Fn` in type aliases!
type T0 = u32; // the return value when zero args are to be applied
type T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> T0; // the return value when one arg is to be applied
type T2 = impl Fn(u32) -> T1; // the return value when two args are to be applied
fn add(x: u32) -> T2 {
return move |y| move |z| x + y + z;
}
Drop that into a cargo project, call add(4)(5)(6)
, cross
your fingers, and run cargo +nightly run
. You should see a
15 unless you forgot to print it!
The In-Betweens
Let us write the magical bits that take us from function to curried function.
Initialize your workspace with cargo new --lib currying
.
Proc-macro crates are libraries with exactly one export, the macro
itself. Add a tests
directory to your crate root. Your
directory should look something like this:
.
├── Cargo.toml
├── src
│ └── lib.rs
└── tests
└── smoke.rs
Dependencies
We will be using a total of 3 external crates:
Here’s a sample Cargo.toml
:
# Cargo.toml
[dependencies]
proc-macro2 = "1.0.9"
quote = "1.0"
[dependencies.syn]
version = "1.0"
features = ["full"]
[lib]
proc-macro = true # this is important!
We will be using an external proc-macro2
crate as well
as an internal proc-macro
crate. Not confusing at all!
The attribute macro
Drop this into src/lib.rs
, to get the ball rolling.
// src/lib.rs
use proc_macro::TokenStream; // 1
use quote::quote;
use syn::{parse_macro_input, ItemFn};
#[proc_macro_attribute] // 2
pub fn curry(_attr: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
let parsed = parse_macro_input!(item as ItemFn); // 3
.into() // 4
generate_curry(parsed)}
fn generate_curry(parsed: ItemFn) -> proc_macro2::TokenStream {}
1. Imports
A Tokenstream
holds (hopefully valid) Rust code, this is
the type of our input and output. Note that we are importing this type
from proc_macro
and not proc_macro2
.
quote!
from the quote
crate is a macro that
allows us to quickly produce TokenStream
s. Much like the
LISP quote
procedure, you can use the quote!
macro for symbolic transformations.
ItemFn
from the syn
crate holds the parsed
TokenStream
of a Rust function.
parse_macro_input!
is a helper macro provided by
syn
.
2. The lone export
Annotate the only pub
of our crate with
#[proc_macro_attribute]
. This tells rustc that
curry
is a procedural macro, and allows us to use it as
#[crate_name::curry]
in other crates. Note the signature of
the curry
function. _attr
is the
TokenStream
representing the attribute itself,
item
refers to the thing we slapped our macro into, in this
case a function (like add
). The return value is a modified
TokenStream
, this will contain our curried version of
add
.
3. The helper macro
A TokenStream
is a little hard to work with, which is
why we have the syn
crate, which provides types to
represent Rust tokens. An RArrow
struct to represent the
return arrow on a function and so on. One of those types is
ItemFn
, that represents an entire Rust function. The
parse_macro_input!
automatically puts the input to our
macro into an ItemFn
. What a gentleman!
4. Returning TokenStream
s
We haven’t filled in generate_curry
yet, but we can see
that it returns a proc_macro2::TokenStream
and not a
proc_macro::TokenStream
, so drop a .into()
to
convert it.
Lets move on, and fill in generate_curry
, I would
suggest keeping the documentation for syn::ItemFn
and syn::Signature
open.
// src/lib.rs
fn generate_curry(parsed: ItemFn) -> proc_macro2::TokenStream {
let fn_body = parsed.block; // function body
let sig = parsed.sig; // function signature
let vis = parsed.vis; // visibility, pub or not
let fn_name = sig.ident; // function name/identifier
let fn_args = sig.inputs; // comma separated args
let fn_return_type = sig.output; // return type
}
We are simply extracting the bits of the function, we will be reusing
the original function’s visibility and name. Take a look at what
syn::Signature
can tell us about a function:
.-- syn::Ident (ident)
/
fn add(x: u32, y: u32) -> u32
(fn_token) / ~~~~~~~,~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
syn::token::Fn --' / \ (output)
' `- syn::ReturnType
Punctuated<FnArg, Comma> (inputs)
Enough analysis, lets produce our first bit of Rust code.
Function Body
Recall that the body of a curried add
should look like
this:
return move |y| move |z| x + y + z;
And in general:
return move |arg2| move |arg3| ... |argN| <function body here>
We already have the function’s body, provided by
fn_body
, in our generate_curry
function. All
that’s left to add is the move |arg2| move |arg3| ...
stuff, for which we need to extract the argument identifiers (doc: Punctuated,
FnArg, PatType):
// src/lib.rs
use syn::punctuated::Punctuated;
use syn::{parse_macro_input, FnArg, Pat, ItemFn, Block};
fn extract_arg_idents(fn_args: Punctuated<FnArg, syn::token::Comma>) -> Vec<Box<Pat>> {
return fn_args.into_iter().map(extract_arg_pat).collect::<Vec<_>>();
}
Alright, so we are iterating over function args
(Punctuated
is a collection that you can iterate over) and
mapping an extract_arg_pat
to every item. What’s
extract_arg_pat
?
// src/lib.rs
fn extract_arg_pat(a: FnArg) -> Box<Pat> {
match a {
FnArg::Typed(p) => p.pat,
=> panic!("Not supported on types with `self`!"),
_ }
}
FnArg
is an enum type as you might have guessed. The
Typed
variant encompasses args that are written as
name: type
and the other variant, Reciever
refers to self
types. Ignore those for now, keep it
simple.
Every FnArg::Typed
value contains a pat
,
which is in essence, the name of the argument. The type of the arg is
accessible via p.ty
(we will be using this later).
With that done, we should be able to write the codegen for the function body:
// src/lib.rs
fn generate_body(fn_args: &[Box<Pat>], body: Box<Block>) -> proc_macro2::TokenStream {
quote! {
return #( move |#fn_args| )* #body
}
}
That is some scary looking syntax! Allow me to explain. The
quote!{ ... }
returns a
proc_macro2::TokenStream
, if we wrote
quote!{ let x = 1 + 2; }
, it wouldn’t create a new variable
x
with value 3, it would literally produce a stream of
tokens with that expression.
The #
enables variable interpolation. #body
will look for body
in the current scope, take its value,
and insert it in the returned TokenStream
. Kinda like quasi
quoting in LISPs, you have written one.
What about #( move |#fn_args| )*
? That is repetition.
quote
iterates through fn_args
, and drops a
move
behind each one, it then places pipes
(|
), around it.
Let us test our first bit of codegen! Modify
generate_curry
like so:
// src/lib.rs
fn generate_curry(parsed: ItemFn) -> TokenStream {
let fn_body = parsed.block;
let sig = parsed.sig;
let vis = parsed.vis;
let fn_name = sig.ident;
let fn_args = sig.inputs;
let fn_return_type = sig.output;
+ let arg_idents = extract_arg_idents(fn_args.clone());
+ let first_ident = &arg_idents.first().unwrap();
+ // remember, our curried body starts with the second argument!
+ let curried_body = generate_body(&arg_idents[1..], fn_body.clone());
+ println!("{}", curried_body);
return TokenStream::new();
}
Add a little test to tests/
:
// tests/smoke.rs
#[currying::curry]
fn add(x: u32, y: u32, z: u32) -> u32 {
+ y + z
x }
#[test]
fn works() {
assert!(true);
}
You should find something like this in the output of
cargo test
:
return move | y | move | z | { x + y + z }
Glorious println!
debugging!
Function signature
This section gets into the more complicated bits of the macro, generating type aliases and the function signature. By the end of this section, we should have a full working auto-currying macro!
Recall what our generated type aliases should look like, for our
add
function:
type T0 = u32;
type T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> T0;
type T2 = impl Fn(u32) -> T1;
In general:
type T0 = <return type>;
type T1 = impl Fn(<type of arg N>) -> T0;
type T2 = impl Fn(<type of arg N - 1>) -> T1;
.
.
.
type T(N-1) = impl Fn(<type of arg 2>) -> T(N-2);
To codegen that, we need the types of:
- all our inputs (arguments)
- the output (the return type)
To fetch the types of all our inputs, we can simply reuse the bits we wrote to fetch the names of all our inputs! (doc: Type)
// src/lib.rs
use syn::{parse_macro_input, Block, FnArg, ItemFn, Pat, ReturnType, Type};
fn extract_type(a: FnArg) -> Box<Type> {
match a {
FnArg::Typed(p) => p.ty, // notice `ty` instead of `pat`
=> panic!("Not supported on types with `self`!"),
_ }
}
fn extract_arg_types(fn_args: Punctuated<FnArg, syn::token::Comma>) -> Vec<Box<Type>> {
return fn_args.into_iter().map(extract_type).collect::<Vec<_>>();
}
A good reader would have looked at the docs for output member of the
syn::Signature
struct. It has the type
syn::ReturnType
. So there is no extraction to do here
right? There are actually a couple of things we have to ensure here:
We need to ensure that the function returns! A function that does not return is pointless in this case, and I will tell you why, in the Notes section.
A
ReturnType
encloses the arrow of the return as well, we need to get rid of that. Recall:type T0 = u32 // and not type T0 = -> u32
Here is the snippet that handles extraction of the return type (doc: syn::ReturnType):
// src/lib.rs
fn extract_return_type(a: ReturnType) -> Box<Type> {
match a {
ReturnType::Type(_, p) => p,
=> panic!("Not supported on functions without return types!"),
_ }
}
You might notice that we are making extensive use of the
panic!
macro. Well, that is because it is a good idea to
quit on receiving an unsatisfactory TokenStream
.
With all our types ready, we can get on with generating type aliases:
// src/lib.rs
use quote::{quote, format_ident};
fn generate_type_aliases(
: &[Box<Type>],
fn_arg_types: Box<Type>,
fn_return_type: &syn::Ident,
fn_name-> Vec<proc_macro2::TokenStream> { // 1
)
let type_t0 = format_ident!("_{}_T0", fn_name); // 2
let mut type_aliases = vec![quote! { type #type_t0 = #fn_return_type }];
// 3
for (i, t) in (1..).zip(fn_arg_types.into_iter().rev()) {
let p = format_ident!("_{}_{}", fn_name, format!("T{}", i - 1));
let n = format_ident!("_{}_{}", fn_name, format!("T{}", i));
.push(quote! {
type_aliasestype #n = impl Fn(#t) -> #p
});
}
return type_aliases;
}
1. The return value
We are returning a Vec<proc_macro2::TokenStream>
, i.
e., a list of TokenStream
s, where each item is a type
alias.
2. Format identifier?
I’ve got some explanation to do on this line. Clearly, we are trying to
write the first type alias, and initialize our TokenStream
vector with T0
, because it is different from the
others:
type T0 = something
// the others are of the form
type Tr = impl Fn(something) -> something
format_ident!
is similar to format!
.
Instead of returning a formatted string, it returns a
syn::Ident
. Therefore, type_t0
is actually an
identifier for, in the case of our add
function,
_add_T0
. Why is this formatting important? Namespacing.
Picture this, we have two functions, add
and
subtract
, that we wish to curry with our macro:
#[curry]
fn add(...) -> u32 { ... }
#[curry]
fn sub(...) -> u32 { ... }
Here is the same but with macros expanded:
type T0 = u32;
type T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> T0;
fn add( ... ) -> T1 { ... }
type T0 = u32;
type T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> T0;
fn sub( ... ) -> T1 { ... }
We end up with two definitions of T0
! Now, if we do the
little format_ident!
dance we did up there:
type _add_T0 = u32;
type _add_T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> _add_T0;
fn add( ... ) -> _add_T1 { ... }
type _sub_T0 = u32;
type _sub_T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> _sub_T0;
fn sub( ... ) -> _sub_T1 { ... }
Voilà! The type aliases don’t tread on each other. Remember to import
format_ident
from the quote
crate.
3. The TokenStream Vector
We iterate over our types in reverse order (T0
is the
last return, T1
is the second last, so on), assign a number
to each iteration with zip
, generate type names with
format_ident
, push a TokenStream
with the help
of quote
and variable interpolation.
If you are wondering why we used (1..).zip()
instead of
.enumerate()
, it’s because we wanted to start counting from
1 instead of 0 (we are already done with T0
!).
Getting it together
I promised we’d have a fully working macro by the end of last
section. I lied, we have to tie everything together in our
generate_curry
function:
// src/lib.rs
fn generate_curry(parsed: ItemFn) -> proc_macro2::TokenStream {
let fn_body = parsed.block;
let sig = parsed.sig;
let vis = parsed.vis;
let fn_name = sig.ident;
let fn_args = sig.inputs;
let fn_return_type = sig.output;
let arg_idents = extract_arg_idents(fn_args.clone());
let first_ident = &arg_idents.first().unwrap();
let curried_body = generate_body(&arg_idents[1..], fn_body.clone());
+ let arg_types = extract_arg_types(fn_args.clone());
+ let first_type = &arg_types.first().unwrap();
+ let type_aliases = generate_type_aliases(
+ &arg_types[1..],
+ extract_return_type(fn_return_type),
+ &fn_name,
+ );
+ let return_type = format_ident!("_{}_{}", &fn_name, format!("T{}", type_aliases.len() - 1));
+ return quote! {
+ #(#type_aliases);* ;
+ #vis fn #fn_name (#first_ident: #first_type) -> #return_type {
+ #curried_body ;
+ }
+ };
}
Most of the additions are self explanatory, I’ll go through the
return statement with you. We are returning a
quote!{ ... }
, so a proc_macro2::TokenStream
.
We are iterating through the type_aliases
variable, which
you might recall, is a Vec<TokenStream>
. You might
notice the sneaky semicolon before the *
. This basically
tells quote
, to insert an item, then a semicolon, and then
the next one, another semicolon, and so on. The semicolon is a
separator. We need to manually insert another semicolon at the end of it
all, quote
doesn’t insert a separator at the end of the
iteration.
We retain the visibility and name of our original function. Our
curried function takes as args, just the first argument of our original
function. The return type of our curried function is actually, the last
type alias we create. If you think back to our manually curried
add
function, we returned T2
, which was in
fact, the last type alias we created.
I am sure, at this point, you are itching to test this out, but before that, let me introduce you to some good methods of debugging proc-macro code.
Debugging and Testing
Install cargo-expand
via:
cargo install cargo-expand
cargo-expand
is a neat little tool that expands your
macro in places where it is used, and lets you view the generated code!
For example:
# create a bin package hello
$ cargo new hello
# view the expansion of the println! macro
$ cargo expand
#![feature(prelude_import)]
#[prelude_import]
use std::prelude::v1::*;
#[macro_use]
extern crate std;
fn main() {
{
::std::io::_print(::core::fmt::Arguments::new_v1(
&["Hello, world!\n"],
&match () {
() => [],
},
));
};
}
Writing proc-macros without cargo-expand
is tantamount
to driving a vehicle without rear view mirrors! Keep an eye on what is
going on behind your back.
Now, your macro won’t always compile, you might just recieve the bee
movie script as an error. cargo-expand
will not work in
such cases. I would suggest printing out your variables to inspect them.
TokenStream
implements Display
as well as
Debug
. We don’t always have to be respectable programmers.
Just print it.
Enough of that, lets get testing:
// tests/smoke.rs
#![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]
#[crate_name::curry]
fn add(x: u32, y: u32, z: u32) -> u32 {
+ y + z
x }
#[test]
fn works() {
assert_eq!(15, add(4)(5)(6));
}
Run cargo +nightly test
. You should see a pleasing
message:
running 1 test
test tests::works ... ok
Take a look at the expansion for our curry macro, via
cargo +nightly expand --tests smoke
:
type _add_T0 = u32;
type _add_T1 = impl Fn(u32) -> _add_T0;
type _add_T2 = impl Fn(u32) -> _add_T1;
fn add(x: u32) -> _add_T2 {
return (move |y| {
move |z| {
return x + y + z;
}
});
}
// a bunch of other stuff generated by #[test] and assert_eq!
A sight for sore eyes.
Here is a more complex example that generates ten multiples of the first ten natural numbers:
#[curry]
fn product(x: u32, y: u32) -> u32 {
* y
x }
fn multiples() -> Vec<Vec<u32>>{
let v = (1..=10).map(product);
return (1..=10)
.map(|x| v.clone().map(|f| f(x)).collect())
.collect();
}
Notes
I didn’t quite explain why we use move |arg|
in our
closure. This is because we want to take ownership of the variable
supplied to us. Take a look at this example:
let v = add(5);
let g;
{
let x = 5;
= v(x);
g }
println!("{}", g(2));
Variable x
goes out of scope before g
can
return a concrete value. If we take ownership of x
by
move
ing it into our closure, we can expect this to work
reliably. In fact, rustc understands this, and forces you to use
move
.
This usage of move
is exactly why a curried
function without a return is useless. Every variable we pass to
our curried function gets moved into its local scope. Playing with these
variables cannot cause a change outside this scope. Returning is our
only method of interaction with anything beyond this function.
Conclusion
Currying may not seem to be all that useful. Curried functions are unwieldy in Rust because the standard library is not built around currying. If you enjoy the possibilities posed by currying, consider taking a look at Haskell or Scheme.
My original intention with peppe.rs was to post condensed articles, a micro blog, but this one turned out extra long.
Perhaps I should call it a ‘macro’ blog :)
caniuse.rs contains an indexed list of features and their status.↩︎
I'm Akshay, programmer and pixel-artist. I write open-source stuff. I also design fonts: scientifica, curie.
Reach out at oppili@irc.rizon.net.