diff options
| author | bors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> | 2020-10-10 12:59:25 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <[email protected]> | 2020-10-10 12:59:25 +0100 |
| commit | b7596d248382aa88b81da4dd6c7598993bc4b787 (patch) | |
| tree | 0ef92bcd580446c4ea44902f0f959d547a698943 /crates/ide/src/syntax_highlighting/test_data | |
| parent | 05261f5aeb1dcf01c5dfcf3e01826e57b1249ca9 (diff) | |
| parent | e90931a2047e6e38f173e2e2f2a24ad648e92e9d (diff) | |
Merge #5858
5858: Draft: Show reason for failed rename refactoring r=rherrmann a=rherrmann
Return an error with a meaningful message for requests to
`textDocument/rename` if the operation cannot be performed.
Pass errors, raised by rename handling code to the LSP runtime.
As a consequence, the VS Code client shows and logs the request
as if a server-side programming error occured.
Screenshot of a rename error showing in VS Code
I would kindly ask to get feedback from the maintainers if they can spare the time:
* Is the general direction of the proposed changes acceptable?
* I'm new to Rust. The code feels clumsy and redundant, please suggest improvements
if you find the time for. E.g. is there a simple replacement for `RenameError`?
* Should presenting the error with proper severity (i.e. not as a programming error) be part of this change or in a followup change?
See https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3981
Co-authored-by: Rüdiger Herrmann <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'crates/ide/src/syntax_highlighting/test_data')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions