Merge #8945

8945: fix: Make expected type work in more situations r=flodiebold a=flodiebold

Also makes call info show the correct types for generic methods.

![2021-05-23-182952_1134x616_scrot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/906069/119269023-dd5a5b00-bbf5-11eb-993a-b6e122c3b9a6.png)
![2021-05-23-183117_922x696_scrot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/906069/119269025-dfbcb500-bbf5-11eb-983c-fc415b8428e0.png)


Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/crates/ide_assists/src/handlers/fix_visibility.rs b/crates/ide_assists/src/handlers/fix_visibility.rs
index 6c7824e55..89f7b2c2c 100644
--- a/crates/ide_assists/src/handlers/fix_visibility.rs
+++ b/crates/ide_assists/src/handlers/fix_visibility.rs
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ fn add_vis_to_referenced_module_def(acc: &mut Assists, ctx: &AssistContext) -> O
 
 fn add_vis_to_referenced_record_field(acc: &mut Assists, ctx: &AssistContext) -> Option<()> {
     let record_field: ast::RecordExprField = ctx.find_node_at_offset()?;
-    let (record_field_def, _) = ctx.sema.resolve_record_field(&record_field)?;
+    let (record_field_def, _, _) = ctx.sema.resolve_record_field(&record_field)?;
 
     let current_module = ctx.sema.scope(record_field.syntax()).module()?;
     let visibility = record_field_def.visibility(ctx.db());