Merge #429

429: Reorganize hir public API in terms of code model r=matklad a=matklad

Recently, I've been thinking about introducing "object orient code model" API for rust: a set of APIs with types like `Function`, `Module`, etc, with methods like `get_containing_declaration()`, `get_type()`, etc. 

Here's how a similar API might look like in .Net land:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.codeanalysis.semanticmodel?view=roslyn-dotnet

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.codeanalysis.imethodsymbol?view=roslyn-dotnet

The main feature of such API is that it can be powered by different backends. For example, one can imagine a backend based on salsa, and a backend which reads all the data from a specially prepared JSON file. The "OO" bit is interesting mostly in this "can swap implementations via dynamic dispatch" aspect, the actual API could have a more database/ECS flavored feeling.

It's not clear at this moment how exactly should we implement such a dynamically (or if we even need dynamism in the first pace) swapable API in Rust, but I'd love to experiment with this a bit. 

For starters, I propose creating a `code_model_api` which contains various definition types and their public methods (mandatory implemented as one-liners, so that the API has a header-file feel). Specifically, I propose that each type is a wrapper around some integer ID, and that all methods of it accept a `&db` argument.  The actual impl goes elsewhere: into the db queries or, absent a better place, into the `code_model_api_impl`. In the first commit, I've moved the simplest type, `Crate`, over to this pattern.

I *think* that we, at least initially, will be used types from `code_model_api` *inside* `hir` as well, but this is not required: we might pick a different implementation down the line, while preserving the API. 

Long term I'd love to replace the `db: &impl HirDatabase` argument by a `mp: &dyn ModelProvider`, implement `ModelProvider` for `T: HirDatabase`, and move `code_model_api` into the separate crate, which does not depend on `hir`. 

@flodiebold you've recently done some `Def`s work, would do you think of this plan? Could it become a good API in the future, or is it just a useless boilerplate duplicating method signatures between `code_model_api` and `code_model_impl`?


Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/crates/ra_analysis/src/goto_defenition.rs b/crates/ra_analysis/src/goto_defenition.rs
index 68b6ac3ba..aa0616e3b 100644
--- a/crates/ra_analysis/src/goto_defenition.rs
+++ b/crates/ra_analysis/src/goto_defenition.rs
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ fn name_defenition(
             if let Some(child_module) =
                 hir::source_binder::module_from_declaration(db, file_id, module)?
             {
-                let file_id = child_module.file_id();
-                let name = match child_module.name() {
+                let (file_id, _) = child_module.defenition_source(db)?;
+                let name = match child_module.name(db)? {
                     Some(name) => name.to_string().into(),
                     None => "".into(),
                 };