diff options
author | bors[bot] <bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-01-06 14:51:10 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | bors[bot] <bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-01-06 14:51:10 +0000 |
commit | cf0ce14351af03c620aca784ee2c03aad86b866e (patch) | |
tree | bffd84981df9cca1143807796dc6772ddcfe8e0b /crates/ra_hir/src/code_model_impl/krate.rs | |
parent | eaf553dade9a28b41631387d7c88b09fd0ba64e2 (diff) | |
parent | 733383446fc229a35d4432d14c295c5a01e5a87f (diff) |
Merge #429
429: Reorganize hir public API in terms of code model r=matklad a=matklad
Recently, I've been thinking about introducing "object orient code model" API for rust: a set of APIs with types like `Function`, `Module`, etc, with methods like `get_containing_declaration()`, `get_type()`, etc.
Here's how a similar API might look like in .Net land:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.codeanalysis.semanticmodel?view=roslyn-dotnet
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.codeanalysis.imethodsymbol?view=roslyn-dotnet
The main feature of such API is that it can be powered by different backends. For example, one can imagine a backend based on salsa, and a backend which reads all the data from a specially prepared JSON file. The "OO" bit is interesting mostly in this "can swap implementations via dynamic dispatch" aspect, the actual API could have a more database/ECS flavored feeling.
It's not clear at this moment how exactly should we implement such a dynamically (or if we even need dynamism in the first pace) swapable API in Rust, but I'd love to experiment with this a bit.
For starters, I propose creating a `code_model_api` which contains various definition types and their public methods (mandatory implemented as one-liners, so that the API has a header-file feel). Specifically, I propose that each type is a wrapper around some integer ID, and that all methods of it accept a `&db` argument. The actual impl goes elsewhere: into the db queries or, absent a better place, into the `code_model_api_impl`. In the first commit, I've moved the simplest type, `Crate`, over to this pattern.
I *think* that we, at least initially, will be used types from `code_model_api` *inside* `hir` as well, but this is not required: we might pick a different implementation down the line, while preserving the API.
Long term I'd love to replace the `db: &impl HirDatabase` argument by a `mp: &dyn ModelProvider`, implement `ModelProvider` for `T: HirDatabase`, and move `code_model_api` into the separate crate, which does not depend on `hir`.
@flodiebold you've recently done some `Def`s work, would do you think of this plan? Could it become a good API in the future, or is it just a useless boilerplate duplicating method signatures between `code_model_api` and `code_model_impl`?
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'crates/ra_hir/src/code_model_impl/krate.rs')
-rw-r--r-- | crates/ra_hir/src/code_model_impl/krate.rs | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/crates/ra_hir/src/code_model_impl/krate.rs b/crates/ra_hir/src/code_model_impl/krate.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..591a81597 --- /dev/null +++ b/crates/ra_hir/src/code_model_impl/krate.rs | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ | |||
1 | use ra_db::{CrateId, Cancelable}; | ||
2 | |||
3 | use crate::{ | ||
4 | HirFileId, Crate, CrateDependency, AsName, DefLoc, DefKind, Module, | ||
5 | db::HirDatabase, | ||
6 | }; | ||
7 | |||
8 | impl Crate { | ||
9 | pub(crate) fn new(crate_id: CrateId) -> Crate { | ||
10 | Crate { crate_id } | ||
11 | } | ||
12 | pub(crate) fn dependencies_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> Vec<CrateDependency> { | ||
13 | let crate_graph = db.crate_graph(); | ||
14 | crate_graph | ||
15 | .dependencies(self.crate_id) | ||
16 | .map(|dep| { | ||
17 | let krate = Crate::new(dep.crate_id()); | ||
18 | let name = dep.as_name(); | ||
19 | CrateDependency { krate, name } | ||
20 | }) | ||
21 | .collect() | ||
22 | } | ||
23 | pub(crate) fn root_module_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> Cancelable<Option<Module>> { | ||
24 | let crate_graph = db.crate_graph(); | ||
25 | let file_id = crate_graph.crate_root(self.crate_id); | ||
26 | let source_root_id = db.file_source_root(file_id); | ||
27 | let file_id = HirFileId::from(file_id); | ||
28 | let module_tree = db.module_tree(source_root_id)?; | ||
29 | // FIXME: teach module tree about crate roots instead of guessing | ||
30 | let (module_id, _) = ctry!(module_tree | ||
31 | .modules_with_sources() | ||
32 | .find(|(_, src)| src.file_id() == file_id)); | ||
33 | |||
34 | let def_loc = DefLoc { | ||
35 | kind: DefKind::Module, | ||
36 | source_root_id, | ||
37 | module_id, | ||
38 | source_item_id: module_id.source(&module_tree).0, | ||
39 | }; | ||
40 | let def_id = def_loc.id(db); | ||
41 | |||
42 | let module = Module::new(def_id); | ||
43 | Ok(Some(module)) | ||
44 | } | ||
45 | } | ||