aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorbors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>2019-12-05 20:00:20 +0000
committerGitHub <[email protected]>2019-12-05 20:00:20 +0000
commit6e10a9f57815ad865a570816436adfdf0de1cdf0 (patch)
tree410c416bfe9daa05743ce8c49418c20df28dd625 /crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests
parent217a6fa4a387dbfe6ac725b6dba2f15d6532679f (diff)
parent10697041c1c72ddbe27c41912e691656be6ccce4 (diff)
Merge #2479
2479: Add expansion infrastructure for derive macros r=matklad a=flodiebold I thought I'd experiment a bit with attribute macro/derive expansion, and here's what I've got so far. It has dummy implementations of the Copy / Clone derives, to show that the approach works; it doesn't add any attribute macro support, but I think that fits into the architecture. Basically, during raw item collection, we look at the attributes and generate macro calls for them if necessary. Currently I only do this for derives, and just add the derive macro calls as separate calls next to the item. I think for derives, it's important that they don't obscure the actual item, since they can't actually change it (e.g. sending the item token tree through macro expansion unnecessarily might make completion within it more complicated). Attribute macros would have to be recognized at that stage and replace the item (i.e., the raw item collector will just emit an attribute macro call, and not the item). I think when we implement this, we should try to recognize known inert attributes, so that we don't do macro expansion unnecessarily; anything that isn't known needs to be treated as a possible attribute macro call (since the raw item collector can't resolve the macro yet). There's basically no name resolution for attribute macros implemented, I just hardcoded the built-in derives. In the future, the built-ins should work within the normal name resolution infrastructure; the problem there is that the builtin stubs in `std` use macros 2.0, which we don't support yet (and adding support is outside the scope of this). One aspect that I don't really have a solution for, but I don't know how important it is, is removing the attribute itself from its input. I'm pretty sure rustc leaves out the attribute macro from the input, but to do that, we'd have to create a completely new syntax node. I guess we could do it when / after converting to a token tree. Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests')
-rw-r--r--crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests/macros.rs51
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests/macros.rs b/crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests/macros.rs
index 0d9a35ce0..9c29a054e 100644
--- a/crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests/macros.rs
+++ b/crates/ra_hir_ty/src/tests/macros.rs
@@ -266,3 +266,54 @@ fn main() {
266 "### 266 "###
267 ); 267 );
268} 268}
269
270#[test]
271fn infer_derive_clone_simple() {
272 let (db, pos) = TestDB::with_position(
273 r#"
274//- /main.rs crate:main deps:std
275#[derive(Clone)]
276struct S;
277fn test() {
278 S.clone()<|>;
279}
280
281//- /lib.rs crate:std
282#[prelude_import]
283use clone::*;
284mod clone {
285 trait Clone {
286 fn clone(&self) -> Self;
287 }
288}
289"#,
290 );
291 assert_eq!("S", type_at_pos(&db, pos));
292}
293
294#[test]
295fn infer_derive_clone_with_params() {
296 let (db, pos) = TestDB::with_position(
297 r#"
298//- /main.rs crate:main deps:std
299#[derive(Clone)]
300struct S;
301#[derive(Clone)]
302struct Wrapper<T>(T);
303struct NonClone;
304fn test() {
305 (Wrapper(S).clone(), Wrapper(NonClone).clone())<|>;
306}
307
308//- /lib.rs crate:std
309#[prelude_import]
310use clone::*;
311mod clone {
312 trait Clone {
313 fn clone(&self) -> Self;
314 }
315}
316"#,
317 );
318 assert_eq!("(Wrapper<S>, {unknown})", type_at_pos(&db, pos));
319}