aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/ra_syntax/src/grammar/items/nominal.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorbors[bot] <bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>2018-10-15 17:48:17 +0100
committerbors[bot] <bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>2018-10-15 17:48:17 +0100
commita230b438e025c5878b8d17e11d3928cbad95bb28 (patch)
tree231872915ede46874b6e7d2b3d1240d1defa5231 /crates/ra_syntax/src/grammar/items/nominal.rs
parente031b65f93f73164a5729cf81ff60299708bc931 (diff)
parent2bc9e9f32711047b06940c335eb5327281f8c555 (diff)
Merge #127
127: Improve folding r=matklad a=aochagavia I was messing around with adding support for multiline comments in folding and ended up changing a bunch of other things. First of all, I am not convinced of folding groups of successive items. For instance, I don't see why it is worthwhile to be able to fold something like the following: ```rust use foo; use bar; ``` Furthermore, this causes problems if you want to fold a multiline import: ```rust use foo::{ quux }; use bar; ``` The problem is that now there are two possible folds at the same position: we could fold the first use or we could fold the import group. IMO, the only place where folding groups makes sense is when folding comments. Therefore I have **removed folding import groups in favor of folding multiline imports**. Regarding folding comments, I made it a bit more robust by requiring that comments can only be folded if they have the same flavor. So if you have a bunch of `//` comments followed by `//!` comments, you will get two separate fold groups instead of a single one. Finally, I rewrote the API in such a way that it should be trivial to add new folds. You only need to: * Create a new FoldKind * Add it to the `fold_kind` function that converts from `SyntaxKind` to `FoldKind` Fixes #113 Co-authored-by: Adolfo OchagavĂ­a <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'crates/ra_syntax/src/grammar/items/nominal.rs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions