Merge branch 'master' into add-disable-diagnostics

1 files changed, 1174 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/crates/ssr/src/tests.rs b/crates/ssr/src/tests.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0d0a00090
--- /dev/null
+++ b/crates/ssr/src/tests.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,1174 @@
+use crate::{MatchFinder, SsrRule};
+use base_db::{salsa::Durability, FileId, FilePosition, FileRange, SourceDatabaseExt};
+use expect::{expect, Expect};
+use rustc_hash::FxHashSet;
+use std::sync::Arc;
+use test_utils::{mark, RangeOrOffset};
+
+fn parse_error_text(query: &str) -> String {
+    format!("{}", query.parse::<SsrRule>().unwrap_err())
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_empty_query() {
+    assert_eq!(parse_error_text(""), "Parse error: Cannot find delimiter `==>>`");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_no_delimiter() {
+    assert_eq!(parse_error_text("foo()"), "Parse error: Cannot find delimiter `==>>`");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_two_delimiters() {
+    assert_eq!(
+        parse_error_text("foo() ==>> a ==>> b "),
+        "Parse error: More than one delimiter found"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_repeated_name() {
+    assert_eq!(
+        parse_error_text("foo($a, $a) ==>>"),
+        "Parse error: Name `a` repeats more than once"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_invalid_pattern() {
+    assert_eq!(
+        parse_error_text(" ==>> ()"),
+        "Parse error: Not a valid Rust expression, type, item, path or pattern"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_invalid_template() {
+    assert_eq!(
+        parse_error_text("() ==>> )"),
+        "Parse error: Not a valid Rust expression, type, item, path or pattern"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn parser_undefined_placeholder_in_replacement() {
+    assert_eq!(
+        parse_error_text("42 ==>> $a"),
+        "Parse error: Replacement contains undefined placeholders: $a"
+    );
+}
+
+/// `code` may optionally contain a cursor marker `<|>`. If it doesn't, then the position will be
+/// the start of the file. If there's a second cursor marker, then we'll return a single range.
+pub(crate) fn single_file(code: &str) -> (ide_db::RootDatabase, FilePosition, Vec<FileRange>) {
+    use base_db::fixture::WithFixture;
+    use ide_db::symbol_index::SymbolsDatabase;
+    let (mut db, file_id, range_or_offset) = if code.contains(test_utils::CURSOR_MARKER) {
+        ide_db::RootDatabase::with_range_or_offset(code)
+    } else {
+        let (db, file_id) = ide_db::RootDatabase::with_single_file(code);
+        (db, file_id, RangeOrOffset::Offset(0.into()))
+    };
+    let selections;
+    let position;
+    match range_or_offset {
+        RangeOrOffset::Range(range) => {
+            position = FilePosition { file_id, offset: range.start() };
+            selections = vec![FileRange { file_id, range: range }];
+        }
+        RangeOrOffset::Offset(offset) => {
+            position = FilePosition { file_id, offset };
+            selections = vec![];
+        }
+    }
+    let mut local_roots = FxHashSet::default();
+    local_roots.insert(base_db::fixture::WORKSPACE);
+    db.set_local_roots_with_durability(Arc::new(local_roots), Durability::HIGH);
+    (db, position, selections)
+}
+
+fn assert_ssr_transform(rule: &str, input: &str, expected: Expect) {
+    assert_ssr_transforms(&[rule], input, expected);
+}
+
+fn assert_ssr_transforms(rules: &[&str], input: &str, expected: Expect) {
+    let (db, position, selections) = single_file(input);
+    let mut match_finder = MatchFinder::in_context(&db, position, selections);
+    for rule in rules {
+        let rule: SsrRule = rule.parse().unwrap();
+        match_finder.add_rule(rule).unwrap();
+    }
+    let edits = match_finder.edits();
+    if edits.is_empty() {
+        panic!("No edits were made");
+    }
+    assert_eq!(edits[0].file_id, position.file_id);
+    // Note, db.file_text is not necessarily the same as `input`, since fixture parsing alters
+    // stuff.
+    let mut actual = db.file_text(position.file_id).to_string();
+    edits[0].edit.apply(&mut actual);
+    expected.assert_eq(&actual);
+}
+
+fn print_match_debug_info(match_finder: &MatchFinder, file_id: FileId, snippet: &str) {
+    let debug_info = match_finder.debug_where_text_equal(file_id, snippet);
+    println!(
+        "Match debug info: {} nodes had text exactly equal to '{}'",
+        debug_info.len(),
+        snippet
+    );
+    for (index, d) in debug_info.iter().enumerate() {
+        println!("Node #{}\n{:#?}\n", index, d);
+    }
+}
+
+fn assert_matches(pattern: &str, code: &str, expected: &[&str]) {
+    let (db, position, selections) = single_file(code);
+    let mut match_finder = MatchFinder::in_context(&db, position, selections);
+    match_finder.add_search_pattern(pattern.parse().unwrap()).unwrap();
+    let matched_strings: Vec<String> =
+        match_finder.matches().flattened().matches.iter().map(|m| m.matched_text()).collect();
+    if matched_strings != expected && !expected.is_empty() {
+        print_match_debug_info(&match_finder, position.file_id, &expected[0]);
+    }
+    assert_eq!(matched_strings, expected);
+}
+
+fn assert_no_match(pattern: &str, code: &str) {
+    let (db, position, selections) = single_file(code);
+    let mut match_finder = MatchFinder::in_context(&db, position, selections);
+    match_finder.add_search_pattern(pattern.parse().unwrap()).unwrap();
+    let matches = match_finder.matches().flattened().matches;
+    if !matches.is_empty() {
+        print_match_debug_info(&match_finder, position.file_id, &matches[0].matched_text());
+        panic!("Got {} matches when we expected none: {:#?}", matches.len(), matches);
+    }
+}
+
+fn assert_match_failure_reason(pattern: &str, code: &str, snippet: &str, expected_reason: &str) {
+    let (db, position, selections) = single_file(code);
+    let mut match_finder = MatchFinder::in_context(&db, position, selections);
+    match_finder.add_search_pattern(pattern.parse().unwrap()).unwrap();
+    let mut reasons = Vec::new();
+    for d in match_finder.debug_where_text_equal(position.file_id, snippet) {
+        if let Some(reason) = d.match_failure_reason() {
+            reasons.push(reason.to_owned());
+        }
+    }
+    assert_eq!(reasons, vec![expected_reason]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_function_to_method() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "my_function($a, $b) ==>> ($a).my_method($b)",
+        "fn my_function() {} fn main() { loop { my_function( other_func(x, y), z + w) } }",
+        expect![["fn my_function() {} fn main() { loop { (other_func(x, y)).my_method(z + w) } }"]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_nested_function() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($a, $b, $c) ==>> bar($c, baz($a, $b))",
+        r#"
+            //- /lib.rs crate:foo
+            fn foo() {}
+            fn bar() {}
+            fn baz() {}
+            fn main { foo  (x + value.method(b), x+y-z, true && false) }
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn foo() {}
+            fn bar() {}
+            fn baz() {}
+            fn main { bar(true && false, baz(x + value.method(b), x+y-z)) }
+        "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_expected_spacing() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($x) + bar() ==>> bar($x)",
+        "fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { foo(5) + bar() }",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { bar(5) }"]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_with_extra_space() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($x  ) +    bar() ==>> bar($x)",
+        "fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { foo(  5 )  +bar(   ) }",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { bar(5) }"]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_keeps_nested_comment() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($x) ==>> bar($x)",
+        "fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { foo(other(5 /* using 5 */)) }",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { bar(other(5 /* using 5 */)) }"]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_keeps_comment() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($x) ==>> bar($x)",
+        "fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { foo(5 /* using 5 */) }",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn main() { bar(5)/* using 5 */ }"]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ssr_struct_lit() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "Foo{a: $a, b: $b} ==>> Foo::new($a, $b)",
+        r#"
+            struct Foo() {}
+            impl Foo { fn new() {} }
+            fn main() { Foo{b:2, a:1} }
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            struct Foo() {}
+            impl Foo { fn new() {} }
+            fn main() { Foo::new(1, 2) }
+        "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ignores_whitespace() {
+    assert_matches("1+2", "fn f() -> i32 {1  +  2}", &["1  +  2"]);
+    assert_matches("1 + 2", "fn f() -> i32 {1+2}", &["1+2"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn no_match() {
+    assert_no_match("1 + 3", "fn f() -> i32 {1  +  2}");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_fn_definition() {
+    assert_matches("fn $a($b: $t) {$c}", "fn f(a: i32) {bar()}", &["fn f(a: i32) {bar()}"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_struct_definition() {
+    let code = r#"
+        struct Option<T> {}
+        struct Bar {}
+        struct Foo {name: Option<String>}"#;
+    assert_matches("struct $n {$f: Option<String>}", code, &["struct Foo {name: Option<String>}"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_expr() {
+    let code = r#"
+        fn foo() {}
+        fn f() -> i32 {foo(40 + 2, 42)}"#;
+    assert_matches("foo($a, $b)", code, &["foo(40 + 2, 42)"]);
+    assert_no_match("foo($a, $b, $c)", code);
+    assert_no_match("foo($a)", code);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_nested_method_calls() {
+    assert_matches(
+        "$a.z().z().z()",
+        "fn f() {h().i().j().z().z().z().d().e()}",
+        &["h().i().j().z().z().z()"],
+    );
+}
+
+// Make sure that our node matching semantics don't differ within macro calls.
+#[test]
+fn match_nested_method_calls_with_macro_call() {
+    assert_matches(
+        "$a.z().z().z()",
+        r#"
+            macro_rules! m1 { ($a:expr) => {$a}; }
+            fn f() {m1!(h().i().j().z().z().z().d().e())}"#,
+        &["h().i().j().z().z().z()"],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_complex_expr() {
+    let code = r#"
+        fn foo() {} fn bar() {}
+        fn f() -> i32 {foo(bar(40, 2), 42)}"#;
+    assert_matches("foo($a, $b)", code, &["foo(bar(40, 2), 42)"]);
+    assert_no_match("foo($a, $b, $c)", code);
+    assert_no_match("foo($a)", code);
+    assert_matches("bar($a, $b)", code, &["bar(40, 2)"]);
+}
+
+// Trailing commas in the code should be ignored.
+#[test]
+fn match_with_trailing_commas() {
+    // Code has comma, pattern doesn't.
+    assert_matches("foo($a, $b)", "fn foo() {} fn f() {foo(1, 2,);}", &["foo(1, 2,)"]);
+    assert_matches("Foo{$a, $b}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo{1, 2,};}", &["Foo{1, 2,}"]);
+
+    // Pattern has comma, code doesn't.
+    assert_matches("foo($a, $b,)", "fn foo() {} fn f() {foo(1, 2);}", &["foo(1, 2)"]);
+    assert_matches("Foo{$a, $b,}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo{1, 2};}", &["Foo{1, 2}"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_type() {
+    assert_matches("i32", "fn f() -> i32 {1  +  2}", &["i32"]);
+    assert_matches(
+        "Option<$a>",
+        "struct Option<T> {} fn f() -> Option<i32> {42}",
+        &["Option<i32>"],
+    );
+    assert_no_match(
+        "Option<$a>",
+        "struct Option<T> {} struct Result<T, E> {} fn f() -> Result<i32, ()> {42}",
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_struct_instantiation() {
+    let code = r#"
+        struct Foo {bar: i32, baz: i32}
+        fn f() {Foo {bar: 1, baz: 2}}"#;
+    assert_matches("Foo {bar: 1, baz: 2}", code, &["Foo {bar: 1, baz: 2}"]);
+    // Now with placeholders for all parts of the struct.
+    assert_matches("Foo {$a: $b, $c: $d}", code, &["Foo {bar: 1, baz: 2}"]);
+    assert_matches("Foo {}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {}}", &["Foo {}"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_path() {
+    let code = r#"
+        mod foo {
+            pub fn bar() {}
+        }
+        fn f() {foo::bar(42)}"#;
+    assert_matches("foo::bar", code, &["foo::bar"]);
+    assert_matches("$a::bar", code, &["foo::bar"]);
+    assert_matches("foo::$b", code, &["foo::bar"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_pattern() {
+    assert_matches("Some($a)", "struct Some(); fn f() {if let Some(x) = foo() {}}", &["Some(x)"]);
+}
+
+// If our pattern has a full path, e.g. a::b::c() and the code has c(), but c resolves to
+// a::b::c, then we should match.
+#[test]
+fn match_fully_qualified_fn_path() {
+    let code = r#"
+        mod a {
+            pub mod b {
+                pub fn c(_: i32) {}
+            }
+        }
+        use a::b::c;
+        fn f1() {
+            c(42);
+        }
+        "#;
+    assert_matches("a::b::c($a)", code, &["c(42)"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_resolved_type_name() {
+    let code = r#"
+        mod m1 {
+            pub mod m2 {
+                pub trait Foo<T> {}
+            }
+        }
+        mod m3 {
+            trait Foo<T> {}
+            fn f1(f: Option<&dyn Foo<bool>>) {}
+        }
+        mod m4 {
+            use crate::m1::m2::Foo;
+            fn f1(f: Option<&dyn Foo<i32>>) {}
+        }
+        "#;
+    assert_matches("m1::m2::Foo<$t>", code, &["Foo<i32>"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn type_arguments_within_path() {
+    mark::check!(type_arguments_within_path);
+    let code = r#"
+        mod foo {
+            pub struct Bar<T> {t: T}
+            impl<T> Bar<T> {
+                pub fn baz() {}
+            }
+        }
+        fn f1() {foo::Bar::<i32>::baz();}
+        "#;
+    assert_no_match("foo::Bar::<i64>::baz()", code);
+    assert_matches("foo::Bar::<i32>::baz()", code, &["foo::Bar::<i32>::baz()"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn literal_constraint() {
+    mark::check!(literal_constraint);
+    let code = r#"
+        enum Option<T> { Some(T), None }
+        use Option::Some;
+        fn f1() {
+            let x1 = Some(42);
+            let x2 = Some("foo");
+            let x3 = Some(x1);
+            let x4 = Some(40 + 2);
+            let x5 = Some(true);
+        }
+        "#;
+    assert_matches("Some(${a:kind(literal)})", code, &["Some(42)", "Some(\"foo\")", "Some(true)"]);
+    assert_matches("Some(${a:not(kind(literal))})", code, &["Some(x1)", "Some(40 + 2)"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_reordered_struct_instantiation() {
+    assert_matches(
+        "Foo {aa: 1, b: 2, ccc: 3}",
+        "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {b: 2, ccc: 3, aa: 1}}",
+        &["Foo {b: 2, ccc: 3, aa: 1}"],
+    );
+    assert_no_match("Foo {a: 1}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {b: 1}}");
+    assert_no_match("Foo {a: 1}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {a: 2}}");
+    assert_no_match("Foo {a: 1, b: 2}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {a: 1}}");
+    assert_no_match("Foo {a: 1, b: 2}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {b: 2}}");
+    assert_no_match("Foo {a: 1, }", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {a: 1, b: 2}}");
+    assert_no_match("Foo {a: 1, z: 9}", "struct Foo {} fn f() {Foo {a: 1}}");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_macro_invocation() {
+    assert_matches(
+        "foo!($a)",
+        "macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn() {foo(foo!(foo()))}",
+        &["foo!(foo())"],
+    );
+    assert_matches(
+        "foo!(41, $a, 43)",
+        "macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn() {foo!(41, 42, 43)}",
+        &["foo!(41, 42, 43)"],
+    );
+    assert_no_match("foo!(50, $a, 43)", "macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn() {foo!(41, 42, 43}");
+    assert_no_match("foo!(41, $a, 50)", "macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn() {foo!(41, 42, 43}");
+    assert_matches(
+        "foo!($a())",
+        "macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn() {foo!(bar())}",
+        &["foo!(bar())"],
+    );
+}
+
+// When matching within a macro expansion, we only allow matches of nodes that originated from
+// the macro call, not from the macro definition.
+#[test]
+fn no_match_expression_from_macro() {
+    assert_no_match(
+        "$a.clone()",
+        r#"
+            macro_rules! m1 {
+                () => {42.clone()}
+            }
+            fn f1() {m1!()}
+            "#,
+    );
+}
+
+// We definitely don't want to allow matching of an expression that part originates from the
+// macro call `42` and part from the macro definition `.clone()`.
+#[test]
+fn no_match_split_expression() {
+    assert_no_match(
+        "$a.clone()",
+        r#"
+            macro_rules! m1 {
+                ($x:expr) => {$x.clone()}
+            }
+            fn f1() {m1!(42)}
+            "#,
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_function_call() {
+    // This test also makes sure that we ignore empty-ranges.
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo() ==>> bar()",
+        "fn foo() {<|><|>} fn bar() {} fn f1() {foo(); foo();}",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn f1() {bar(); bar();}"]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_function_call_with_placeholders() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($a, $b) ==>> bar($b, $a)",
+        "fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn f1() {foo(5, 42)}",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn f1() {bar(42, 5)}"]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_nested_function_calls() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($a) ==>> bar($a)",
+        "fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn f1() {foo(foo(42))}",
+        expect![["fn foo() {} fn bar() {} fn f1() {bar(bar(42))}"]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_associated_function_call() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "Foo::new() ==>> Bar::new()",
+        r#"
+            struct Foo {}
+            impl Foo { fn new() {} }
+            struct Bar {}
+            impl Bar { fn new() {} }
+            fn f1() {Foo::new();}
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            struct Foo {}
+            impl Foo { fn new() {} }
+            struct Bar {}
+            impl Bar { fn new() {} }
+            fn f1() {Bar::new();}
+        "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_associated_trait_default_function_call() {
+    mark::check!(replace_associated_trait_default_function_call);
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "Bar2::foo() ==>> Bar2::foo2()",
+        r#"
+            trait Foo { fn foo() {} }
+            pub struct Bar {}
+            impl Foo for Bar {}
+            pub struct Bar2 {}
+            impl Foo for Bar2 {}
+            impl Bar2 { fn foo2() {} }
+            fn main() {
+                Bar::foo();
+                Bar2::foo();
+            }
+        "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            trait Foo { fn foo() {} }
+            pub struct Bar {}
+            impl Foo for Bar {}
+            pub struct Bar2 {}
+            impl Foo for Bar2 {}
+            impl Bar2 { fn foo2() {} }
+            fn main() {
+                Bar::foo();
+                Bar2::foo2();
+            }
+        "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_associated_trait_constant() {
+    mark::check!(replace_associated_trait_constant);
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "Bar2::VALUE ==>> Bar2::VALUE_2222",
+        r#"
+            trait Foo { const VALUE: i32; const VALUE_2222: i32; }
+            pub struct Bar {}
+            impl Foo for Bar { const VALUE: i32 = 1;  const VALUE_2222: i32 = 2; }
+            pub struct Bar2 {}
+            impl Foo for Bar2 { const VALUE: i32 = 1;  const VALUE_2222: i32 = 2; }
+            impl Bar2 { fn foo2() {} }
+            fn main() {
+                Bar::VALUE;
+                Bar2::VALUE;
+            }
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            trait Foo { const VALUE: i32; const VALUE_2222: i32; }
+            pub struct Bar {}
+            impl Foo for Bar { const VALUE: i32 = 1;  const VALUE_2222: i32 = 2; }
+            pub struct Bar2 {}
+            impl Foo for Bar2 { const VALUE: i32 = 1;  const VALUE_2222: i32 = 2; }
+            impl Bar2 { fn foo2() {} }
+            fn main() {
+                Bar::VALUE;
+                Bar2::VALUE_2222;
+            }
+        "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_path_in_different_contexts() {
+    // Note the <|> inside module a::b which marks the point where the rule is interpreted. We
+    // replace foo with bar, but both need different path qualifiers in different contexts. In f4,
+    // foo is unqualified because of a use statement, however the replacement needs to be fully
+    // qualified.
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "c::foo() ==>> c::bar()",
+        r#"
+            mod a {
+                pub mod b {<|>
+                    pub mod c {
+                        pub fn foo() {}
+                        pub fn bar() {}
+                        fn f1() { foo() }
+                    }
+                    fn f2() { c::foo() }
+                }
+                fn f3() { b::c::foo() }
+            }
+            use a::b::c::foo;
+            fn f4() { foo() }
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            mod a {
+                pub mod b {
+                    pub mod c {
+                        pub fn foo() {}
+                        pub fn bar() {}
+                        fn f1() { bar() }
+                    }
+                    fn f2() { c::bar() }
+                }
+                fn f3() { b::c::bar() }
+            }
+            use a::b::c::foo;
+            fn f4() { a::b::c::bar() }
+            "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_associated_function_with_generics() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "c::Foo::<$a>::new() ==>> d::Bar::<$a>::default()",
+        r#"
+            mod c {
+                pub struct Foo<T> {v: T}
+                impl<T> Foo<T> { pub fn new() {} }
+                fn f1() {
+                    Foo::<i32>::new();
+                }
+            }
+            mod d {
+                pub struct Bar<T> {v: T}
+                impl<T> Bar<T> { pub fn default() {} }
+                fn f1() {
+                    super::c::Foo::<i32>::new();
+                }
+            }
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            mod c {
+                pub struct Foo<T> {v: T}
+                impl<T> Foo<T> { pub fn new() {} }
+                fn f1() {
+                    crate::d::Bar::<i32>::default();
+                }
+            }
+            mod d {
+                pub struct Bar<T> {v: T}
+                impl<T> Bar<T> { pub fn default() {} }
+                fn f1() {
+                    Bar::<i32>::default();
+                }
+            }
+            "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_type() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "Result<(), $a> ==>> Option<$a>",
+        "struct Result<T, E> {} struct Option<T> {} fn f1() -> Result<(), Vec<Error>> {foo()}",
+        expect![[
+            "struct Result<T, E> {} struct Option<T> {} fn f1() -> Option<Vec<Error>> {foo()}"
+        ]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_macro_invocations() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "try!($a) ==>> $a?",
+        "macro_rules! try {() => {}} fn f1() -> Result<(), E> {bar(try!(foo()));}",
+        expect![["macro_rules! try {() => {}} fn f1() -> Result<(), E> {bar(foo()?);}"]],
+    );
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo!($a($b)) ==>> foo($b, $a)",
+        "macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn f1() {foo!(abc(def() + 2));}",
+        expect![["macro_rules! foo {() => {}} fn f1() {foo(def() + 2, abc);}"]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_binary_op() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "$a + $b ==>> $b + $a",
+        "fn f() {2 * 3 + 4 * 5}",
+        expect![["fn f() {4 * 5 + 2 * 3}"]],
+    );
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "$a + $b ==>> $b + $a",
+        "fn f() {1 + 2 + 3 + 4}",
+        expect![[r#"fn f() {4 + (3 + (2 + 1))}"#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_binary_op() {
+    assert_matches("$a + $b", "fn f() {1 + 2 + 3 + 4}", &["1 + 2", "1 + 2 + 3", "1 + 2 + 3 + 4"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn multiple_rules() {
+    assert_ssr_transforms(
+        &["$a + 1 ==>> add_one($a)", "$a + $b ==>> add($a, $b)"],
+        "fn add() {} fn add_one() {} fn f() -> i32 {3 + 2 + 1}",
+        expect![["fn add() {} fn add_one() {} fn f() -> i32 {add_one(add(3, 2))}"]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn multiple_rules_with_nested_matches() {
+    assert_ssr_transforms(
+        &["foo1($a) ==>> bar1($a)", "foo2($a) ==>> bar2($a)"],
+        r#"
+            fn foo1() {} fn foo2() {} fn bar1() {} fn bar2() {}
+            fn f() {foo1(foo2(foo1(foo2(foo1(42)))))}
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn foo1() {} fn foo2() {} fn bar1() {} fn bar2() {}
+            fn f() {bar1(bar2(bar1(bar2(bar1(42)))))}
+        "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_within_macro_invocation() {
+    let code = r#"
+            macro_rules! foo {
+                ($a:stmt; $b:expr) => {
+                    $b
+                };
+            }
+            struct A {}
+            impl A {
+                fn bar() {}
+            }
+            fn f1() {
+                let aaa = A {};
+                foo!(macro_ignores_this(); aaa.bar());
+            }
+        "#;
+    assert_matches("$a.bar()", code, &["aaa.bar()"]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_within_macro_expansion() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "$a.foo() ==>> bar($a)",
+        r#"
+            macro_rules! macro1 {
+                ($a:expr) => {$a}
+            }
+            fn bar() {}
+            fn f() {macro1!(5.x().foo().o2())}
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            macro_rules! macro1 {
+                ($a:expr) => {$a}
+            }
+            fn bar() {}
+            fn f() {macro1!(bar(5.x()).o2())}
+            "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_outside_and_within_macro_expansion() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($a) ==>> bar($a)",
+        r#"
+            fn foo() {} fn bar() {}
+            macro_rules! macro1 {
+                ($a:expr) => {$a}
+            }
+            fn f() {foo(foo(macro1!(foo(foo(42)))))}
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn foo() {} fn bar() {}
+            macro_rules! macro1 {
+                ($a:expr) => {$a}
+            }
+            fn f() {bar(bar(macro1!(bar(bar(42)))))}
+        "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn preserves_whitespace_within_macro_expansion() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "$a + $b ==>> $b - $a",
+        r#"
+            macro_rules! macro1 {
+                ($a:expr) => {$a}
+            }
+            fn f() {macro1!(1   *   2 + 3 + 4}
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            macro_rules! macro1 {
+                ($a:expr) => {$a}
+            }
+            fn f() {macro1!(4 - (3 - 1   *   2)}
+            "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn add_parenthesis_when_necessary() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo($a) ==>> $a.to_string()",
+        r#"
+        fn foo(_: i32) {}
+        fn bar3(v: i32) {
+            foo(1 + 2);
+            foo(-v);
+        }
+        "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn foo(_: i32) {}
+            fn bar3(v: i32) {
+                (1 + 2).to_string();
+                (-v).to_string();
+            }
+        "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_failure_reasons() {
+    let code = r#"
+        fn bar() {}
+        macro_rules! foo {
+            ($a:expr) => {
+                1 + $a + 2
+            };
+        }
+        fn f1() {
+            bar(1, 2);
+            foo!(5 + 43.to_string() + 5);
+        }
+        "#;
+    assert_match_failure_reason(
+        "bar($a, 3)",
+        code,
+        "bar(1, 2)",
+        r#"Pattern wanted token '3' (INT_NUMBER), but code had token '2' (INT_NUMBER)"#,
+    );
+    assert_match_failure_reason(
+        "42.to_string()",
+        code,
+        "43.to_string()",
+        r#"Pattern wanted token '42' (INT_NUMBER), but code had token '43' (INT_NUMBER)"#,
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn overlapping_possible_matches() {
+    // There are three possible matches here, however the middle one, `foo(foo(foo(42)))` shouldn't
+    // match because it overlaps with the outer match. The inner match is permitted since it's is
+    // contained entirely within the placeholder of the outer match.
+    assert_matches(
+        "foo(foo($a))",
+        "fn foo() {} fn main() {foo(foo(foo(foo(42))))}",
+        &["foo(foo(42))", "foo(foo(foo(foo(42))))"],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn use_declaration_with_braces() {
+    // It would be OK for a path rule to match and alter a use declaration. We shouldn't mess it up
+    // though. In particular, we must not change `use foo::{baz, bar}` to `use foo::{baz,
+    // foo2::bar2}`.
+    mark::check!(use_declaration_with_braces);
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo::bar ==>> foo2::bar2",
+        r#"
+        mod foo { pub fn bar() {} pub fn baz() {} }
+        mod foo2 { pub fn bar2() {} }
+        use foo::{baz, bar};
+        fn main() { bar() }
+        "#,
+        expect![["
+        mod foo { pub fn bar() {} pub fn baz() {} }
+        mod foo2 { pub fn bar2() {} }
+        use foo::{baz, bar};
+        fn main() { foo2::bar2() }
+        "]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn ufcs_matches_method_call() {
+    let code = r#"
+    struct Foo {}
+    impl Foo {
+        fn new(_: i32) -> Foo { Foo {} }
+        fn do_stuff(&self, _: i32) {}
+    }
+    struct Bar {}
+    impl Bar {
+        fn new(_: i32) -> Bar { Bar {} }
+        fn do_stuff(&self, v: i32) {}
+    }
+    fn main() {
+        let b = Bar {};
+        let f = Foo {};
+        b.do_stuff(1);
+        f.do_stuff(2);
+        Foo::new(4).do_stuff(3);
+        // Too many / too few args - should never match
+        f.do_stuff(2, 10);
+        f.do_stuff();
+    }
+    "#;
+    assert_matches("Foo::do_stuff($a, $b)", code, &["f.do_stuff(2)", "Foo::new(4).do_stuff(3)"]);
+    // The arguments needs special handling in the case of a function call matching a method call
+    // and the first argument is different.
+    assert_matches("Foo::do_stuff($a, 2)", code, &["f.do_stuff(2)"]);
+    assert_matches("Foo::do_stuff(Foo::new(4), $b)", code, &["Foo::new(4).do_stuff(3)"]);
+
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "Foo::do_stuff(Foo::new($a), $b) ==>> Bar::new($b).do_stuff($a)",
+        code,
+        expect![[r#"
+            struct Foo {}
+            impl Foo {
+                fn new(_: i32) -> Foo { Foo {} }
+                fn do_stuff(&self, _: i32) {}
+            }
+            struct Bar {}
+            impl Bar {
+                fn new(_: i32) -> Bar { Bar {} }
+                fn do_stuff(&self, v: i32) {}
+            }
+            fn main() {
+                let b = Bar {};
+                let f = Foo {};
+                b.do_stuff(1);
+                f.do_stuff(2);
+                Bar::new(3).do_stuff(4);
+                // Too many / too few args - should never match
+                f.do_stuff(2, 10);
+                f.do_stuff();
+            }
+        "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn pattern_is_a_single_segment_path() {
+    mark::check!(pattern_is_a_single_segment_path);
+    // The first function should not be altered because the `foo` in scope at the cursor position is
+    // a different `foo`. This case is special because "foo" can be parsed as a pattern (IDENT_PAT ->
+    // NAME -> IDENT), which contains no path. If we're not careful we'll end up matching the `foo`
+    // in `let foo` from the first function. Whether we should match the `let foo` in the second
+    // function is less clear. At the moment, we don't. Doing so sounds like a rename operation,
+    // which isn't really what SSR is for, especially since the replacement `bar` must be able to be
+    // resolved, which means if we rename `foo` we'll get a name collision.
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo ==>> bar",
+        r#"
+        fn f1() -> i32 {
+            let foo = 1;
+            let bar = 2;
+            foo
+        }
+        fn f1() -> i32 {
+            let foo = 1;
+            let bar = 2;
+            foo<|>
+        }
+        "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn f1() -> i32 {
+                let foo = 1;
+                let bar = 2;
+                foo
+            }
+            fn f1() -> i32 {
+                let foo = 1;
+                let bar = 2;
+                bar
+            }
+        "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_local_variable_reference() {
+    // The pattern references a local variable `foo` in the block containing the cursor. We should
+    // only replace references to this variable `foo`, not other variables that just happen to have
+    // the same name.
+    mark::check!(cursor_after_semicolon);
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo + $a ==>> $a - foo",
+        r#"
+            fn bar1() -> i32 {
+                let mut res = 0;
+                let foo = 5;
+                res += foo + 1;
+                let foo = 10;
+                res += foo + 2;<|>
+                res += foo + 3;
+                let foo = 15;
+                res += foo + 4;
+                res
+            }
+            "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn bar1() -> i32 {
+                let mut res = 0;
+                let foo = 5;
+                res += foo + 1;
+                let foo = 10;
+                res += 2 - foo;
+                res += 3 - foo;
+                let foo = 15;
+                res += foo + 4;
+                res
+            }
+        "#]],
+    )
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_path_within_selection() {
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo ==>> bar",
+        r#"
+        fn main() {
+            let foo = 41;
+            let bar = 42;
+            do_stuff(foo);
+            do_stuff(foo);<|>
+            do_stuff(foo);
+            do_stuff(foo);<|>
+            do_stuff(foo);
+        }"#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn main() {
+                let foo = 41;
+                let bar = 42;
+                do_stuff(foo);
+                do_stuff(foo);
+                do_stuff(bar);
+                do_stuff(bar);
+                do_stuff(foo);
+            }"#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_nonpath_within_selection() {
+    mark::check!(replace_nonpath_within_selection);
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "$a + $b ==>> $b * $a",
+        r#"
+        fn main() {
+            let v = 1 + 2;<|>
+            let v2 = 3 + 3;
+            let v3 = 4 + 5;<|>
+            let v4 = 6 + 7;
+        }"#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            fn main() {
+                let v = 1 + 2;
+                let v2 = 3 * 3;
+                let v3 = 5 * 4;
+                let v4 = 6 + 7;
+            }"#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn replace_self() {
+    // `foo(self)` occurs twice in the code, however only the first occurrence is the `self` that's
+    // in scope where the rule is invoked.
+    assert_ssr_transform(
+        "foo(self) ==>> bar(self)",
+        r#"
+        struct S1 {}
+        fn foo(_: &S1) {}
+        fn bar(_: &S1) {}
+        impl S1 {
+            fn f1(&self) {
+                foo(self)<|>
+            }
+            fn f2(&self) {
+                foo(self)
+            }
+        }
+        "#,
+        expect![[r#"
+            struct S1 {}
+            fn foo(_: &S1) {}
+            fn bar(_: &S1) {}
+            impl S1 {
+                fn f1(&self) {
+                    bar(self)
+                }
+                fn f2(&self) {
+                    foo(self)
+                }
+            }
+        "#]],
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn match_trait_method_call() {
+    // `Bar::foo` and `Bar2::foo` resolve to the same function. Make sure we only match if the type
+    // matches what's in the pattern. Also checks that we handle autoderef.
+    let code = r#"
+        pub struct Bar {}
+        pub struct Bar2 {}
+        pub trait Foo {
+            fn foo(&self, _: i32) {}
+        }
+        impl Foo for Bar {}
+        impl Foo for Bar2 {}
+        fn main() {
+            let v1 = Bar {};
+            let v2 = Bar2 {};
+            let v1_ref = &v1;
+            let v2_ref = &v2;
+            v1.foo(1);
+            v2.foo(2);
+            Bar::foo(&v1, 3);
+            Bar2::foo(&v2, 4);
+            v1_ref.foo(5);
+            v2_ref.foo(6);
+        }
+        "#;
+    assert_matches("Bar::foo($a, $b)", code, &["v1.foo(1)", "Bar::foo(&v1, 3)", "v1_ref.foo(5)"]);
+    assert_matches("Bar2::foo($a, $b)", code, &["v2.foo(2)", "Bar2::foo(&v2, 4)", "v2_ref.foo(6)"]);
+}