aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crates/syntax/test_data/parser/fragments/path
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorbors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>2021-03-16 08:05:24 +0000
committerGitHub <[email protected]>2021-03-16 08:05:24 +0000
commit1a82af3527e476d52410ff4dfd2fb4c57466abcb (patch)
tree0c86e28a43908e099bb522727f93c28b301e6f3c /crates/syntax/test_data/parser/fragments/path
parent62ec04bbd53ba50e21a7b8f23d46958d322640eb (diff)
parentd5f0f58e6330efd8200f93a6904caafc600a904e (diff)
parent455b418263df80da5cd80e2af1df27b7e165c0c3 (diff)
Merge #7900 #8000
7900: show function params in completion detail r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan This resolves #7842 by updating the detail for function completions from `-> T` to `fn(T, U) -> V`. I added an expicit unit test for this, `ide_completion::render::fn_detail_includes_args_and_return_type`, which passes. Lots of other unit tests fail (~60 of them) due to this change, although I believe the failures are purely cosmetic (they were testing the exact format of this output). I'm happy to go update those tests, but before I do that I'd like to make sure this is in fact the format we want for the detail? edit - I realized `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo test` automatically updates `expect!` tests. Big :+1: to whoever worked on that! So I'll go ahead and update all these tests soon. But I still would like to confirm `fn(T, U) -> V` is the desired content in the `detail` field. 8000: Use hir formatter for hover text r=matklad a=oxalica Fix #2765 , (should) fix #4665 Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: oxalica <[email protected]>