aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/editors/code/src/test/fixtures/rust-diagnostics/warning
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRyan Cumming <[email protected]>2019-06-27 12:30:23 +0100
committerRyan Cumming <[email protected]>2019-06-29 08:39:36 +0100
commitabc0784e57610a0cceca63301489918015418df6 (patch)
tree05aec9fef88f31cee82e3507903a1dbcd6b4d30d /editors/code/src/test/fixtures/rust-diagnostics/warning
parent0e1912de528b5092c10eedaf94c43c67d5f86f1a (diff)
Fix `cargo watch` code action filtering
There are two issues with the implementation of `provideCodeActions` introduced in #1439: 1. We're returning the code action based on the file its diagnostic is in; not the file the suggested fix is in. I'm not sure how often fixes are suggested cross-file but it's something we should handle. 2. We're not filtering code actions based on the passed range. The means if there is any suggestion in a file we'll show an action for every line of the file. I naively thought that VS Code would filter for us but that was wrong. Unfortunately the VS Code `CodeAction` object is very complex - it can handle edits across multiple files, run commands, etc. This makes it complex to check them for equality or see if any of their edits intersects with a specified range. To make it easier to work with suggestions this introduces a `SuggestedFix` model object and a `SuggestFixCollection` code action provider. This is a layer between the raw Rust JSON and VS Code's `CodeAction`s. I was reluctant to introduce another layer of abstraction here but my attempt to work directly with VS Code's model objects was worse.
Diffstat (limited to 'editors/code/src/test/fixtures/rust-diagnostics/warning')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions