| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes all markdown when the client does not support the markdown MarkupKind
Otherwise the output on the editor will have some markdown boilerplate, making it less readable
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems like a better factoring logically; ideally, clients shouldn't touch
`set_` methods of the database directly. Additionally, I think this
should remove the unfortunate duplication in fixture code.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
5988: Postfix completions for fmt-like string literals r=matklad a=popzxc
This pull request adds a bunch of new postfix completions for `format`-like string literls.
For example, `"{32} {some_var:?}".println` will expand to `println!("{} {:?}", 32, some_var)`.
Postfix completions were added for most common format-like macros:
- `println` -> `println!(...)`
- `fmt` -> `format!(...)`
- `panic` -> `panic!(...)`
- `log` macros:
+ `logi` -> `log::info!(...)`
+ `logw` -> `log::warn!(...)`
+ `loge` -> `log::error!(...)`
+ `logt` -> `log::trace!(...)`
+ `logd` -> `log::debug!(...)`
![fmt_postfix](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12111581/92998650-a048af80-f523-11ea-8fd8-410146de8caa.gif)
Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
5954: Add flexible configuration for runnables r=popzxc a=popzxc
This PR introduces two new configuration options for runnables: `overrideCargo` and `cargoExtraArgs`.
These options are applied to all the "run" tasks of rust analyzer, such as binaries and tests.
Overall motivation is that rust-analyzer provides similar options, for example, for `rustfmt`, but not for runnables.
## `overrideCargo`
This option allows user to replace `cargo` command with something else (well, something that is compatible with the cargo arguments).
Motivation is that some projects may have wrappers around cargo (or even whole alternatives to cargo), which do something related to the project, and only then run `cargo`. With this feature, such users will be able to use lens and run tests directly from the IDE rather than from terminal.
![cargo_override](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12111581/92306622-2f404f80-ef99-11ea-9bb7-6c6192a2c54a.gif)
## `cargoExtraArgs`
This option allows user to add any additional arguments for `cargo`, such as `--release`.
It may be useful, for example, if project has big integration tests which take too long in debug mode, or if any other `cargo` flag has to be passed.
![cargo_extra_args](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12111581/92306658-821a0700-ef99-11ea-8be9-bf0aff78e154.gif)
Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6105: Fix path comparison not comparing paths correctly with unequal lengths r=matklad a=Veykril
~~This PR includes the commit from #6102 there as I found a bug while writing that(so either merging this or both in order works) so I included a test there already which was just ignored.~~ This PR fixes that, basically inserting imports didn't consider path length for equality, so depending on the order it might insert the path before or after another import if they only differ in segment length.
~~Diff without the commit of #6102 https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/commit/2d90d3937d71f9a00f3d44c15b20679215311637~~
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6104: Minor clippy performance suggestions r=matklad a=kjeremy
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|/|
| |
| | |
cargo update as well
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
This should help with troubleshooting wrong project configuration
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
6019: Remove make::path_from_text r=matklad a=Veykril
This removes the `make::path_from_text` function, which according to a note should've been private. I removed it since it didn't really serve a purpose as it was simply wrapping `make::ast_from_text`.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6088: Update chalk to 0.30.0 r=flodiebold a=nathanwhit
Fixes #6078 and CI failures.
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <[email protected]>
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
6033: Make name resolution resolve proc macros instead of relying purely on the build system r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This makes name resolution look at proc-macro declaration attributes like `#[proc_macro_derive]` and defines the right proc macro in the macro namespace, fixing unresolved custom derives like `thiserror::Error` (which can cause false positives, now that we emit diagnostics for unresolved imports).
This works even when proc-macro support is turned off, in which case we fall back to a dummy expander that always returns an error. IMO this is the right way to handle at least the name resolution part of proc. macros, while the *expansion* itself should rely on the build system to build and provide the macro DLL. It does mean that they may go out of sync, but we can provide diagnostics if that happens (something like "could not find macro X in crate Y – ensure that all files of crate Y are saved").
I think it is valuable to be able to reason about proc macros even when we can't expand them, since proc macro expansion can break between Rust releases or users might not want to turn it on for performance reasons. It allows us to provide better diagnostics on any proc macro invocation we're not expanding (like a weak warning that informs the user that proc macro support is turned off, or that it has been disabled because the server crashed).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/5763
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
|