Introduce dedicated AST node for union

Although structs and unions have the same syntax and differ only in
the keyword, re-using the single syntax node for both of them leads to
confusion in practice, and propagates further down the hir in an
upleasent way.

Moreover, static and consts also share syntax, but we use different
nodes for them.

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs b/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs
index de506d7cd..1a03ae56c 100644
--- a/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs
+++ b/crates/ra_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs
@@ -3789,6 +3789,34 @@ impl AstNode for TypeRef {
 }
 impl TypeRef {}
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
+pub struct UnionDef {
+    pub(crate) syntax: SyntaxNode,
+}
+impl AstNode for UnionDef {
+    fn can_cast(kind: SyntaxKind) -> bool {
+        match kind {
+            UNION_DEF => true,
+            _ => false,
+        }
+    }
+    fn cast(syntax: SyntaxNode) -> Option<Self> {
+        if Self::can_cast(syntax.kind()) {
+            Some(Self { syntax })
+        } else {
+            None
+        }
+    }
+    fn syntax(&self) -> &SyntaxNode {
+        &self.syntax
+    }
+}
+impl ast::VisibilityOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::NameOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::TypeParamsOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::AttrsOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl ast::DocCommentsOwner for UnionDef {}
+impl UnionDef {}
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
 pub struct UseItem {
     pub(crate) syntax: SyntaxNode,
 }